Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cell Biology,Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,Histology
Reference41 articles.
1. • Zhang Y, Wang Y, Shi J, Hua Z, Xu J. Cardiac output measurements via echocardiography versus thermodilution: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0222105. This systematic review concluded there is no significant difference in cardiac output measurements between ultrasound and thermodilution.
2. Stein JH, Neumann A, Preston LM, Costanzo MR, Parrillo JE, Johnson MR, et al. Echocardiography for hemodynamic assessment of patients with advanced heart failure and potential heart transplant recipients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:1765–72.
3. Cordero-Caban K, Jolly G, Sakr A, Stoletniy L, Abramov D. Echocardiography-based hemodynamic monitoring use on inpatients listed for heart transplantation under 2018 allocation policy in United States. Transplant Proc. 2021;53:3036–8.
4. • Iwano H, Utsunomiya H, Shibayama K, Tanaka H, Isotani A, Onishi T, et al. Results of PRospect trial to Elucidate the utility of EchocarDiography-based Cardiac ouTput in acute heart failure (PREDICT). J Cardiol. 2022;S0914–5087(22)00055–7. This prospective study assessed the utility of echo-based cardiac output measurement in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. The authors concluded that in patients with systolic heart failure, low cardiac output (measured using echo) in combination with physical exam was predictor of worsening heart failure.
5. Omote K, Nagai T, Iwano H, Tsujinaga S, Kamiya K, Aikawa T, et al. Left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral in hospitalized heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. ESC Heart Failure. 2020;7:168–76.