Let’s Play at Digging
-
Published:2022-06
Issue:2
Volume:33
Page:172-195
-
ISSN:1045-6767
-
Container-title:Human Nature
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Hum Nat
Author:
Mateos AnaORCID, Zorrilla-Revilla GuillermoORCID, Rodríguez JesúsORCID
Abstract
AbstractExtractive foraging tasks, such as digging, are broadly practiced among hunter-gatherer populations in different ecological conditions. Despite tuber-gathering tasks being widely practiced by children and adolescents, little research has focused on the physical traits associated with digging ability. Here, we assess how age and energetic expenditure affect the performance of this extractive task. Using an experimental approach, the energetic cost of digging to extract simulated tubers is evaluated in a sample of 40 urban children and adolescents of both sexes to measure the intensity of the physical effort and the influence of several anatomical variables. Digging is a moderately vigorous activity for inexperienced girls and boys from 8 to 14 years old, and it requires significant physical effort depending on strength and body size. However, extracting subterranean resources is a task that may be performed effectively without previous training. Sex-specific and age-specific differences in the net energy expenditure of digging were detected, even though both sexes exhibited similar proficiency levels when performing the task. Our results highlight that both boys and girls spend considerable energy while digging, with differences largely driven by body size and age. Other factors beyond ability and experience, such as strength and body size, may influence the proficiency of juveniles in performing certain physically intensive foraging tasks, such as gathering tubers.
Funder
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades Consejería de Educación, Junta de Castilla y León
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Anthropology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference117 articles.
1. Ainsworth, B. E., Haskell, W. L., Whitt, M. C., Irwin, M. L., Swartz, A. M., Strath, S. J., O’Brien, W. L., Basett, D. R., Schmitz, K. H., Emplaincourt, P. O., Jacobs, D. R., & Leon, A. S. (2000). Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 32(9, SUPP/1), S498–S504. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200009001-00009 2. Akkermans, M. A., Sillen, M. J. H., Wouters, E. F. M., & Spruit, M. A. (2012). Validation of the oxycon mobile metabolic system in healthy subjects. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 11, 182–183. 3. Apicella, C. L. (2014). Upper-body strength predicts hunting reputation and reproductive success in Hadza hunter-gatherers. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 508–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.07.001 4. Apicella, C. L., Crittenden, A. N., & Tobolsky, V. A. (2017). Hunter-gatherer males are more risk-seeking than females, even in late childhood. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38, 592–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.01.003 5. Bird, D. W., & Bliege Bird, R. (2002). Children on the reef: Slow learning or strategic foraging? Human Nature, 13(2), 269–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-002-1010-9
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|