Do Social Sciences Threaten the Autonomy of Ethics? Reconstructing the Marxian Metaethical Response

Author:

Dimitrakos ThodorisORCID

Abstract

AbstractIn the present paper, I attempt to provide a reconstructed Marxian response to the question of whether the social (and behavioral) sciences constitute a philosophical threat to the autonomy of ethics. I suggest that shedding light on some aspects of the Marxian work (especially the Theses on Feuerbach), from the standpoint of the debate on naturalism in contemporary analytic philosophy, can offer valuable philosophical insights against the framework of scientific naturalism. This framework is responsible for presenting the social sciences as a philosophical threat to the autonomy of ethics. I argue that Marx detects and rejects three fundamental presuppositions of scientific naturalism: empiricism, ‘God’s point of view,’ and methodological individualism. I conclude that the Marxian view is a liberal naturalist perspective which allows both the scientific comprehension of the social world and the autonomy of ethics.

Funder

University of Patras

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference85 articles.

1. Acton, H.B. 1955. The Illusion of the Epoch: Marxism-Leninism as a Philosophical Creed. London: Cohen & West.

2. Althusser, Louis. 1976. Essays in Self-Criticism. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press.

3. Althusser, Louis. 2003. The Humanist Controversy and Other Writings, 1966-67. London/New York: Verso.

4. Althusser, Louis. 2005. For Marx. London/New York: Verso.

5. Anscombe, G.E.M. 2000. Intention, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3