Public Reason and Abortion: Was Rawls Right After All?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Public Reason and Abortion: Was Rawls Right After All?

Published:2019-02-28 Issue:1 Volume:23 Page:37-53
ISSN:1382-4554
Container-title:The Journal of Ethics
language:en
Short-container-title:J Ethics

Author:

Arrell Robbie^ORCID

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Philosophy

Link

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10892-019-09280-8/fulltext.html

Reference20 articles.

1. Dick, Philip K. 2000. The pre-persons. In The complete stories of Philip K. Dick vol. 5: The eye of the sibyl and other classic stories, 275–296. New York: Citadel Press.

2. Dworkin, Ronald. 2006. Justice in robes. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

3. Finnis, John. 1998. Public reason, abortion, and cloning. Valparaiso University Law Review 32: 361–382.

4. Finnis, John. 2000. Abortion, natural law, and public reason. In Natural law and public reason, ed. Robert P. George and Christopher Wolfe, 75–105. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

5. Gaus, Gerald F. 1996. Justificatory liberalism: An essay on epistemology and political theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Liberalism, polarization, and the aggregation problem;Synthese;2023-12-18

2. The philosophy of legal change: theoretical perspectives and practical processes;Jurisprudence;2021-11-16

3. Are Boycotts, Shunning, and Shaming Corrupt?;Oxford Journal of Legal Studies;2021-05-03

4. On anti‐abortion violence;Philosophy and Phenomenological Research;2021-01-19