What Makes Work “Good” in the Age of Artificial Intelligence (AI)? Islamic Perspectives on AI-Mediated Work Ethics

Author:

Ghaly MohammedORCID

Abstract

AbstractArtificial intelligence (AI) technologies are increasingly creeping into the work sphere, thereby gradually questioning and/or disturbing the long-established moral concepts and norms communities have been using to define what makes work good. Each community, and Muslims make no exception in this regard, has to revisit their moral world to provide well-thought frameworks that can engage with the challenging ethical questions raised by the new phenomenon of AI-mediated work. For a systematic analysis of the broad topic of AI-mediated work ethics from an Islamic perspective, this article focuses on presenting an accessible overview of the “moral world” of work in the Islamic tradition. Three main components of this moral world were selected due to their relevance to the AI context, namely (1) Work is inherently good for humans, (2) Practising a religiously permitted profession and (c) Maintaining good relations with involved stakeholders. Each of these three components is addressed in a distinct section, followed by a sub-section highlighting the relevance of the respective component to the particular context of AI-mediated work. The article argues that there are no unsurmountable barriers in the Islamic tradition against the adoption of AI technologies in work sphere. However, important precautions should be considered to ensure that embracing AI will not be at the cost of work-related moral values. The article also highlights how important lessons can be learnt from the positive historical experience of automata that thrived in the Islamic civilization.

Funder

Hamad bin Khalifa University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Philosophy

Reference102 articles.

1. ʿAbd al-Jabbār. 1963. Al-Mughnī fī abwāb al-ʿadl wa al-tawḥīd Cairo: Al-Muʾassasa al-Miṣriyya al-ʿĀmma li al-Taʾlīf wa al-Tarjama wa al-Ṭibāʿa wa al-Nashr.

2. ʿAbd al-Jabbār. 1996. Sharḥ al-usūl al-khamsa. Cairo: Maktabat Wahba.

3. Al-Alwani, T. 2001. Fatwa concerning the United States Supreme courtroom frieze. Journal of Law and Religion 15: 1–28.

4. Al-Ḥakīm al-Tirmidhī. 1976. Ādāb al-murīdīn wa bayān al-kasb. Maṭbaʿat al-Saʿāda.

5. Ansari, Z. 1969. Taftazānī’s views on Taklīf, Ğabr, and Qadar: a note on the development of Islamic theology. Arabica 16(1): 65–78.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3