Abstract
AbstractThis article shows the philosophical kinship between Adam Smith and Mary Wollstonecraft on the subject of love. Though the two major 18th century thinkers are not traditionally brought into conversation with each other, Wollstonecraft and Smith share deep moral concerns about the emerging commercial society. As the new middle class continues to grow along with commerce, vanity becomes an ever more common vice among its members. But a vain person is preoccupied with appearance, status, and flattery—things that get in the way of what Smith and Wollstonecraft regard as the deep human connection they variously describe as love, sympathy, and esteem. Commercial society encourages inequality, Smith argues, and Wollstonecraft points out that this inequality is particularly obvious in the relationships between men and women. Men are vain about their wealth, power and status; women about their appearance. Added to this is the fact that most middle class women are both uneducated and encouraged by the conduct literature of their day to be sentimental and irrational. The combined economic and moral considerations of Wollstonecraft and Smith show that there is very little room for love in commercial society as they conceived it.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference29 articles.
1. Barker, D.K., and S.F. Feiner. 2004. Liberating economics: Feminist perspectives on families, work, and globalization. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Univ. of Michigan Press.
2. Bilger, A. 1998. Laughing feminism: Subversive comedy in Frances Burney, Maria Edgeworth, and Jane Austen. Detroit: Wayne State UP.
3. Bjørnholt, M. and A. McKay, eds. 2014. Counting on Marilyn Waring: New advances in feminist economics. Demeter Press.
4. Bodkin, R.G. 1999. Women’s agency in classical economic thought: Adam Smith, Harriet Taylor Mill and J.S. Mill. Feminist Economics 5(1): 45–60.
5. Browne, A. 1987. The eighteenth century feminist mind. Sussex: Harvester Press.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献