Why We (Almost Certainly) are Not Moral Equals-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Why We (Almost Certainly) are Not Moral Equals

Published:2017-03-10 Issue:4 Volume:21 Page:375-401
ISSN:1382-4554
Container-title:The Journal of Ethics
language:en
Short-container-title:J Ethics

Author:

Husi Stan^ORCID

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Philosophy

Link

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10892-017-9250-4/fulltext.html

Reference66 articles.

1. Acemoglu, D., and J. Robinson. 2013. Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. New York: Crown Publishing.

2. Anderson, E. 1999. What is the point of equality? Ethics 109 (2): 287–337.

3. Aristotle. 2004. Nichomachean Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

4. Arneson, R. 1999. What, if anything, renders all humans morally equal? In Peter Singer and his Critics, ed. Dale Jamieson, 103–128. Oxford: Blackwell.

5. Arneson, R. 2013. Egalitarianism. In The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2013 Edition), ed. E. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/egalitarianism/ .

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Unjust equal relations;Economics and Philosophy;2024-05-14

2. Binary Properties as the Basis of Equality;American Philosophical Quarterly;2024-04-01

3. A Basis for Biocentric Equality?;Environmental Ethics;2024

4. Basic equality: A Hegelian resolution;European Journal of Philosophy;2023-07-13

5. On The Problem of Defending Basic Equality: Natural Law and The Substance View;The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine;2023-07-05