Abstract
AbstractVisual servoing enables tracking and grasping of static and moving objects and locating regions of interest. Its implementation requires the coordination of low-level control tasks with high-level supervision and planning. The use of the PID-based manipulation control addresses only the dynamical response and requires the use of optimization-based techniques at the supervisory level. On the contrary, model predictive control (MPC) simplifies the design as it combines both tasks within a single algorithm. However, successful MPC implementation depends on the quality of the internal model utilized by the algorithm. Robots are intrinsically and significantly nonlinear control objects, so their models are inherently complex. This leads to computational problems. Standard solutions are to shorten the MPC horizons or to parallelize calculations. The approach suggested here returns to the problem roots, i.e. to the model. This study proposes simplified models that allow the use of the MPC. General Hammerstein–Wiener-like model is applied to an arm, which is further simplified into the linear dynamics used as the predictive supervisory control over the torque control. The head uses linear dynamics used by the supervisory MPC working with the base servomotors. It is shown that they are computationally efficient and sufficiently accurate. It is shown that the linear MPC controllers, which use the suggested simplified dynamic robot models, can successfully support visual servoing with accurate control. They are compared with standard PID-based structures and show their superiority. The proposed approach is successfully validated using Matlab and Gazebo robot simulator and is ultimately confirmed by experiments on a real robot.
Funder
Centre for Priority Research Area Artificial Intelligence and Robotics of Warsaw University of Technology within the Excellence Initiative: Research University (IDUB) programme
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference58 articles.
1. Altan, A., Hacıoğlu, R.: Model predictive control of three-axis gimbal system mounted on UAV for real-time target tracking under external disturbances. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 138, 106548 (2020)
2. Ardakani, M.M.G., Olofsson, B., Robertsson, A., et al.: Real-time trajectory generation using model predictive control. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), pp. 942–948 (2015)
3. Assa, A., Janabi-Sharifi, F.: Hybrid predictive control for constrained visual servoing. In: 2014 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, pp. 931–936 (2014)
4. Åström, K.J., B. W.: Adaptive Control, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Boston (1994)
5. Barreto, J.P., Batista, J., Araujo, H.: Model predictive control to improve visual control of motion: applications in active tracking of moving targets. In: Proceedings 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. ICPR-2000, vol. 4, pp. 732–735 (2000)