Abstract
Abstract
Aim
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of 30°-angled Er:YAG laser tip and different periodontal instruments on root surface roughness and morphology in vitro.
Methods
Eighteen bovine teeth root without carious lesion were decoronated from the cementoenamel junction and seperated longitidunally. A total of 36 obtained blocks were mounted in resin blocks and polished with silicon carbide papers under water irrigation. These blocks were randomly assigned into 3 treatment groups. In Group 1, 30°-angled Er:YAG laser (2.94 μm) tip was applied onto the blocks with a 20 Hz, 120 mJ energy output under water irrigation for 20 s. In Groups 2 and 3, the same treatment was applied to the blocks with new generation ultrasonic tip and conventional curette apico-coronally for 20 s with a sweeping motion. Surface roughness and morphology were evaluated before and after instrumentation with a profilometer and SEM, respectively.
Results
After instrumentation, profilometric analysis revealed significantly higher roughness values compared to baseline in all treatment groups(p < 0.05). Laser group revealed the roughest surface morphology followed by conventional curette and new generation ultrasonic tip treatment groups (p < 0.05). In SEM analysis, irregular surfaces and crater defects were seen more frequently in the laser group.
Conclusion
Results of the study showed that the use of new generation ultrasonic tip was associated with smoother surface morphology compared to 30°-angled Er-YAG laser tip and conventional curette. Further in vitro and in vivo studies with an increased sample size are necessary to support the present study findings.
Funder
University of Health Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference27 articles.
1. Kassebaum NJ, Bernabé E, Dahiya M, Bhandari B, Murray CJ, Marcenes W (2014) Global burden of severe periodontitis in 1990–2010: a systematic review and meta-regression. J Dent Res 93(11):1045–1053
2. Kim SY, Kang MK, Kang SM, Kim HE (2018) Effects of ultrasonic instrumentation on enamel surfaces with various defects. Int J Dent Hyg 16(2):219–224
3. Adriaens PA, Adriaens LM (2004) Effects of nonsurgical periodontal therapy on hard and soft tissues. Periodontol 2000 36(1):121–145
4. Folwaczny M, George G, Thiele L, Mehl A, Hickel R (2002) Root surface roughness following Er:YAG laser irradiation at different radiation energies and working tip angulations. J Clin Periodontol 29(7):598–603
5. Kuka GI, Kuru B, Gursoy H (2023) Evaluation of the different supragingival Prophylaxis Tips on Enamel surfaces. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg 41(5):212–217