Abstract
AbstractPatellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is a set of symptoms that negatively affect the daily life activities of the individual, leading to functional disability and significant loss of labor, especially in young adults. PFPS is usually due to weakness of the vastus medialis obliquus (VMO) resulting in abnormal patellar tracking and pain. Our study aims to compare the efficacy of high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) on pain and lower extremity function in the treatment of PFPS with different electrophysical agents (EPAs). The study was designed as a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Forty-five people with PFPS (aged 25–45 years) were included in the study. The patients were randomly divided into three groups and a total of ten sessions of treatment were administered to all three groups for 2 weeks, 5 days a week. High-intensity laser (HILT) and exercise program were applied to group 1. Ultrasound (US), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), and exercise program were applied to group 2. In group 3, US, interferential current (IFC), and exercise program were applied. Both groups underwent three evaluations: pre-treatment, post-treatment, and 12 weeks after treatment. Outcome measures included the visual analog scale for pain severity (VAS), knee flexion range of motion (FROM), Q angle, pain threshold, muscle strength of quadriceps and hamstring, Kujala patellofemoral scoring, lower extremity functional scale (LEFS), and Timed Up and Go Test (TUG). The ANOVA was used for comparing the data of the groups, and two-way repeated measure ANOVA was used to compare at the pre-post and post-intervention 3rd month. The LSD and Bonferroni post hoc tests were also used to identify the between-group differences. Groups 2 and 3 were statistically effective in pain and functionality (p < 0.05). Group 1 was found to be statistically more effective than other groups in reducing pain (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.000/0.000; p = 0.000), increasing knee flexion angle (95% CI, 127.524/135.809; p = 0.000), and increasing lower extremity function (95% CI, 75.970/79.362; p = 0.000). This study indicated that high-intensity laser therapy was found to be a more effective method in the treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome after 3 months of follow-up compared to US-TENS combination and US-interferential current combination treatments. Also, HILT can be used as an effective method in combination with an appropriate exercise program including vastus medialis strengthening to reduce pain and increase functionality in the patients with PFPS.
Funder
Istanbul Medipol University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference51 articles.
1. Smith BE, Selfe J, Thacker D, Hendrick P, Bateman M, Moffatt F, Rathleff MS, Smith TO, Logan P (2018) Incidence and prevalence of patellofemoral pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 13(1):e0190892. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190892
2. LaBella C (2004) Patellofemoral pain syndrome: evaluation and treatment. Prim Care Clin Office Pract 31:977–1003
3. Decary S et al (2018) Validity of combining history elements and physical examination tests to diagnose patellofemoral pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 99(4):607–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2017.10.014
4. Winters M, Holden S, Lura CB, Welton NJ, Caldwell DM, Vicenzino BT, Weir A, Rathleff MS, Marra J, Syndrome PP, Dolak KL, Silkman C, Mckeon JM, Hosey RG, Lattermann C, Uhl TL, de Souza Júnior JR, Rabelo PHR, Lemos TV, Aksoy C (2020) Effects of three gait retraining techniques in runners with patellofemoral pain. British J Sports Medic 41(1):1–12
5. Culvenor AG, Segal NA, Guermazi A, Roemer F, Felson DT, Nevitt MC, Lewis CE, Stefanik JJ (2019) Sex-specific influence of quadriceps weakness on worsening patellofemoral and tibiofemoral cartilage damage: a prospective cohort study. Arthritis Care Res 71:1360–1365