Author:
Hidayat Wahyu,Sahara David P.,Widiyantoro Sri,Suharsono Suharsono,Riyanto Erwin,Nukman Mochamad,Wattimena Ridho Kresna,Melati Sari,Sitorus Eric,Nainggolan Turgod,Putra I. Putu Raditya Ambara
Abstract
AbstractCaving activity results in an increased induced seismicity which should be monitored to avoid massive and uncontrolled rock damage. This research was conducted at the Deep Mill Level Zone (DMLZ) underground mine, the deepest underground mine in Indonesia operated by PT Freeport Indonesia. This research aims to monitor cave propagation by using 4D tomography with a catalogue of microseismic for 57 days with a total of 14,821 events recorded by 84 stations consisting of 176,265 P phases and 133,472 S phases. The data is divided into four subsets to see the velocity evolution related to cave progress. Checkerboard Resolution Test (CRT) and Derivative Weight Sum (DWS) are used to assess the resolution of the inversion. 3D initial velocity model is constructed based on geological information and coring data. We have succeeded in identifying the interpreted cave propagation of a 60 m extension to the NW at around 100 m above undercut level based on 4D changes in velocity tomogram validate by Time Domain Reflectometry data. The decrease of Vp and Vs in subset 3 is interpreted due to the fracturing processes as the cave progresses. Furthermore, we observe a stress redistribution along with the progress of the cave, which is characterized by high velocities (Vp and Vs) due to compensation for changes in low velocity values in the area in front of the cave, which is starting to collapse. We suggest that a considerable change in the velocity tomogram as an indicator of impending caving.
Funder
Institut Teknologi Bandung
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference50 articles.
1. Benson CH, Bosscher PJ (1999) Time-domain reflectometry (TDR) in geotechnics: a review. ASTM International
2. Bommer JJ, Oates S, Cepeda JM, Lindholm C, Bird J, Torres R, Marroquín G, Rivas J (2006) Control of hazard due to seismicity induced by a hot fractured rock geothermal project. Eng Geol 83(4):287–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.11.002
3. Brown ET (2002) Block caving geomechanics. Julius Kruttschnitt Mineral Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Indooroopilly, Qld
4. Campbell AD, Mu EA, Lilley CR (2016) Cave propagation and open pit interaction at the Ernest henry mine. In 7th International conference on mass mining at: Sydney, vol 7, 17
5. Chambers DJA, Koper KD, Pankow KL, McCarter MK (2015) Detecting and characterizing coal mine related seismicity in the Western U.S. using subspace methods. Geophys J Int 203(2):1388–1399. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv383