Author:
Chen Yi,Zhou Lei,Peng Yu,Ren Xiangyan
Abstract
AbstractCoalbed methane production failures through hydraulic fracturing in the Linxing gas field in China have encountered significant setbacks, hindering efforts to enhance the recovery of deep CBM reserves in the region. To address this challenge, we investigate the potential of directional wells with multiple hydraulic slots as a stimulation technology for deep coalbed methane extraction. This study presents two numerical models to evaluate the effectiveness of this technology. The first model is a continuum damage numerical model based on the Material Point Method, which simulates large deformations and complex contact behaviors induced by hydraulic slotting in the deep coal seam. The second model is a wellbore-pore coupling model to simulate the gas extraction process. We verified both numerical models against theoretical and experimental results. We conducted a case study in the Linxing gas field using these models. The investigation assessed stress relief, gas desorption, and permeability enhancement around a large deformed hydraulic slot, as well as the gas extraction performance of a directional well with multiple slots. The results indicate that (1) The Linxing gas recovery failure may be attributed to unsuccessful hydraulic fracturing based on the history matching analysis of field production; (2) Hydraulic slotting causes gradual compaction of the slot until full closure, and results in a rapid stress drop exceeding 7 MPa in the elliptical zone surrounding the slot, which is the large plastic damage zone; (3) The enhanced permeability in plastic zone exceeds ten times the natural coal permeability, leading to total gas desorption of 556 m3 from elastic and plastic zones; (4) Performance optimization can be achieved through reducing slot length and increasing slot width when using directional well with multiple slots. In summary, this research demonstrates the efficiency of directional wells with multiple slots in enhancing gas recovery from deep coal seams.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economic Geology,General Energy,Geophysics,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Reference62 articles.
1. Cui JQ, Hou YB, Xie SR, Chen DD, Yan XX, Meng SZ (2023) Study on the effect of strain-softening on permeability and gas pressure in surrounding rocks of a hydraulic flushing borehole. ACS Omega 8(17):15501–15517
2. Chen ZR, Jeffrey RG, Zhang X (2015) Numerical modeling of three-dimensional T-shaped hydraulic fractures in coal seams using a cohesive zone finite element model. Hydraul Fract J 2:20–37
3. Ding SL, Liu JJ, Xu BH (2012) Factors influencing coal bed methane reservoir in southeastern edge of Ordos Basin, China. Energ Explor Exploit 30(4):677–688
4. Drucker DC, Prager W (2013) Soil mechanics and plastic analysis or limit design. Q Appl Math 10(2):65–157
5. Fan YP, Shu LY, Huo ZG, Hao JW, Li Y (2021) Numerical simulation of sectional hydraulic reaming for methane extraction from coal seams. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 95:104180