Funder
National Research Foundation,South Africa
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference126 articles.
1. Antonites, A., & Ashley, C. Z. (2016). The mobilities turn and archaeology: New perspectives on socio-political complexity in thirteenth-century northern South Africa. Azania: Archaeological Research in Africa, 51, 469–488.
2. Antonites, A. R., Bradfield, J., & Forssman, T. (2016). Technological, functional and contextual aspects of the K2 and Mapungubwe worked bone industries. African Archaeological Review, 33, 437–463.
3. Barham, L. (1992). Let’s walk before we run: An appraisal of historical materialist approaches to the Later Stone Age. South African Archaeological Bulletin, 47, 44–51.
4. Beaumont, P. B., Smith, A. B. & Vogel, J. C. (1995). Before the Einiqua: The archaeology of the frontier zone. In: A. B. Smith (Ed.), Einiqualand: Studies of the orange river frontier, (pp. 236–264). University of Cape Town Press.
5. Bousman, C. B. (2005). Coping with risk: Later Stone Age technological strategies at Blydefontein Rock Shelter, South Africa. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 24, 193–226.