Abstract
AbstractPermeable reactive barriers (PRBs) containing metallic iron (Fe0) as reactive materials are currently considered as an established technology for groundwater remediation. Fe0 PRBs have been introduced by a field demonstration based on the fortuitous observation that aqueous trichloroethylenes are eliminated in Fe0-based sampling vessels. Since then, Fe0 has been tested and used for treating various biological (e.g. bacteria, viruses) and chemical (organic and inorganic) contaminants from polluted waters. There is a broad consensus on the view that “reactivity loss” and “permeability loss” are the two main problems hampering the design of sustainable Fe0 systems. However, the view that Fe0 is a reducing agent (electron donor) under environmental conditions should be regarded as a distortion of Corrosion Science. This is because it has been long established that aqueous iron corrosion is a spontaneous process and results in the Fe0 surface being shielded by an oxide scale. The multi-layered oxide scale acts as a conduction barrier for electrons from Fe0. Accordingly, “reactivity loss”, defined as reduced electron transfer to contaminants, must be revisited. On the other hand, because “stoichiometric” ratios were considered while designing the first generation of Fe0 PRBs (Fe0 as reductant), “permeability loss” should also be revisited. The aim of this communication is to clarify this issue and reconcile a proven efficient technology with its scientific roots (i.e. corrosion science).
Funder
Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China
Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Water Science and Technology
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献