Abstract
AbstractThe agricultural drainage engineering community is steadily shifting the design of subsurface drainage systems from the experience-based design approach to the simulation-based design approach. As with any design problem, two challenges are faced; firstly, how to determine all the input data required by the simulation model, and secondly to, a priori, anticipate what the performance of the designed system will be. This study sought to evaluate the performance of the WaSim model to simulate fluctuating water table depths (WTD), and drainage discharges (DD) in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa. Saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat), which is an input to the WaSim model, was estimated by the Rosetta computer program, based on soil particle size distribution data, bulk density, and soil water retention characteristics at pressure heads of – 33 and – 1500 kPa. performance of the WaSim model was statistically assessed using the coefficient of determination (R2), coefficient of residual mass (CRM), mean absolute error (MAE), mean percent error (MPE), and the nash–sutcliffe efficiency (NSE). during the validation period, the WaSim model predicted WTDs with R2, CRM, MAE, MPE, and NSE of 0.86, 0.003, 4.9 cm, 6.0%, and 0.98, respectively. In the same validation period, the model predicted DDs with R2, CRM, MAE, MPE, and NSE of 0.57, 0.002, 0.30 mm day−1,11%, and 0.76, respectively. These results suggest that the use of Rosetta-estimated Ksat data as inputs to the WaSim model compromised its accuracy and applicability as a subsurface drainage design tool. Owing to the relatively low R2 value of 0.57, and that the WaSim model was empirically developed, we recommend further improvement on the calibration of the model for it to be suitable for application under the prevailing conditions. Also, in the absence of other means of determining Ksat, we caution the use of Rosetta-estimated Ksat data as inputs to the WaSim model for the design and analysis of subsurface drainage systems in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa.
Funder
Water Research Commission, South Africa
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Water Science and Technology
Reference49 articles.
1. Agricultural land drainage: a wider application through caution and restraint. ILRI Annu Rep. International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
2. Bahceci I, Dinc N, Tari AF, Argar AI, Sonmez B (2006) Water and salt balance studies, SaltMOD, to improve subsurface drainage design in the konya-cumra plain, Turkey. Agric Water Manag 85:261–271
3. Bastiaanssen WGM, Allen RG, Droogers P, Steduto P (2007) Twenty-five years modeling irrigated and drained soils: state of the art. Agric Water Manag 92:111–125
4. Borin M, Morari F, Bonaiti G, Paasch M, Skaggs RW (2000) Analysis of DRAINMOD performances with different detail of soil input data in veneto regions of Italy. Agric Water Manag 42(3):259–272
5. Bouma J van Lanen JAJ (1987) Transfer functions and threshold values: from soil characteristics to land qualities. In: KJ Beek (Eds) Quantities land evaluation, international institute of aerospace survey eaarth science ITC publication 6, pp 106–110