Abstract
AbstractIn this study, flow pattern in Beshar River as a main branch of Karoon River has been analyzed using CCHE2D. For this purpose, a 12-km reach upstream of Shahmokhtar hydrometric station near Yasuj city was considered. The CCHE2D model was calibrated using different Manning’s roughness coefficients and different turbulent models; for this purpose, numerical results were compared with observation data for three different discharges. The results showed that for the medium and high discharges, less Manning’s roughness coefficients (0.015 ≥ n ≥ 0.025) and for low discharge, higher Manning’s roughness coefficients (0.035 ≤ n ≤ 0.050) are more suitable. Also, k–ε turbulent model is more effective in this study. Besides, variations of hydraulic parameters like water depth, velocity, shear stress and Froude number are calculated and discussed. The analysis of the flow and velocity pattern in the straight and meander reaches of the river shows that the changes trend of the water surface gradient and velocity in the cross sections of this two reaches are different. Due to effect of secondary currents, latitude gradient of the water surface and depth average velocities increase to the outer bank of the bend. But in the straight reach, latitude gradient of the water surface is almost zero and the maximum velocities are in the center-line of flow. The R-squared (RSQ) and linear correlation coefficient (r) factors between velocity and shear stress show that there is linear and direct relationship between these two hydraulic parameters in the entire study reach.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference27 articles.
1. Bonnefille R (1963) Essais de synthese des lois de debut d’entrainment des sediment sous l’action d’un courant en regime uniform. Bull du CREC, No. 5, Chatou
2. Borgohain PL, Phukan S, Ahuja DR (2019) Downstream channel changes and the likely impacts of flow augmentation by a hydropower project in River Dikrong, India. Int J River Basin Manag 17(1):25–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2018.1439497
3. De Vriend HJ (1981) A mathematical model of steady flow in curved shallow channels. J Hydraul Res 15(1):37–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221687709499748
4. Elyasi M, Kamandbedast AA (2014) The effect of angle of intakes on diversion sediments in river bend with CCHE2D model. Adv Environ Biol J 8(22):180–186
5. Fathi M, Honarbakhsh A, Rostami M, Nasri M, Moradi Y (2012) Sensitive analysis of calculated mesh for CCHE2D numerical model. World Appl Sci J 18:1037–1051. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2012.18.08.911
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献