An experimental comparison of 3D velocity components around single and twin piers installed in a sharp bend under the influence of upstream implemented vanes

Author:

Safaripour NedaORCID,Vaghefi MohammadORCID,Mahmoudi AminORCID

Abstract

AbstractTo reduce the trend of scouring, understanding the flow pattern around the bridge piers is necessary. By using hydraulic structures such as submerged vanes, it is possible to alter the flow pattern of water, thus scouring process and sediment transport in riverbeds. Since the scouring mechanism for pier groups differs from single pier, experiments were conducted in a 180° sharp bend channel in the laboratory to investigate the flow pattern around pier group and single pier under the influence of 25% submerged vanes. Furthermore, a comparison was made between the flow patterns in single pier and pier group conditions. Three-dimensional velocities along the bend and different depths were measured using an Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter (ADV(. The results suggest that the maximum vorticity value at the apex position of the bend (location of piers) and the maximum secondary flow value, at the distance between the piers and the vanes, were found to be, 0.15 and 0.89, respectively. In the twin pier experiment, the maximum Reynolds shear stress value $${\tau }_{yx}$$ τ yx decreased by about 36%, and the minimum value decreased by about 49% compared to the single pier experiment. The final results indicated that using submerged vanes obtained the maximum $${\tau }_{yx}$$ τ yx and $${\tau }_{zx}$$ τ zx near the vanes. Near the bed and mid-depth of the water flow, the geometric location of the maximum velocity also occurred around the vanes in both experiments. Therefore, the vanes are important in altering the water flow pattern, diverting the flow from around piers and consequently reducing the bridge pier scouring.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3