Abstract
AbstractThe present study aimed to create novel hybrid models to produce groundwater potentiality models (GWP) in the Teesta River basin of Bangladesh. Six ensemble machine learning (EML) algorithms, such as random forest (RF), random subspace, dagging, bagging, naïve Bayes tree (NBT), and stacking, coupled with fuzzy logic (FL) models and a ROC-based weighting approach have been used for creating hybrid models integrated GWP. The GWP was then verified using both parametric and nonparametric receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC), such as the empirical ROC (eROC) and the binormal ROC curve (bROC). We conducted an RF-based sensitivity analysis to compute the relevancy of the conditioning variables for GWP modeling. The very high and high groundwater potential regions were predicted as 831–1200 km2 and 521–680 km2 areas based on six EML models. Based on the area under the curve of the ROC, the NBT (eROC: 0.892; bROC: 0.928) model outperforms rest of the models. Six GPMs were considered variables for the next step and turned into crisp fuzzy layers using the fuzzy membership function, and the ROC-based weighting approach. Subsequently four fuzzy logic operators were used to assimilate the crisp fuzzy layers, including AND, OR, GAMMA0.8, and GAMMA 0.9, as well as GAMMA0.9. Thus, we created four hybrid models using FL model. The results of the eROC and bROC curve showed that GAMMA 0.9 operator outperformed other fuzzy operators-based GPMs in terms of accuracy. According to the validation outcomes, four hybrid models outperformed six EML models in terms of performance. The present study will aid in enhancing the efficiency of GPMs in preparing viable planning for groundwater management.
Funder
Deanship of Scientific Research, King Khalid University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Water Science and Technology
Reference101 articles.
1. Abdulkadir TS, Muhammad RUM, Wan Yusof K et al (2019) Quantitative analysis of soil erosion causative factors for susceptibility assessment in a complex watershed. Cogent Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2019.1594506
2. Abd Manap M, Nampak H, Pradhan B, Lee S, Sulaiman WNA, Ramli MF (2014) Application of probabilistic-based frequency ratio model in groundwater potential mapping using remote sensing data and GIS. Arab J Geosci 7(2):711–724
3. Ajibade FO, Olajire OO, Ajibade TF et al (2021) Groundwater potential assessment as a preliminary step to solving water scarcity challenges in Ekpoma, Edo State, Nigeria. Acta Geophys 69:1367–1381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-021-00611-8
4. Akter S, Howladar MF, Ahmed Z, Chowdhury TR (2019) The rainfall and discharge trends of Surma River area in North-eastern part of Bangladesh: an approach for understanding the impacts of climatic change. Environ Syst Res 8:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-019-0156-y
5. Al-Abadi AM, Shahid S (2015) A comparison between index of entropy and catastrophe theory methods for mapping groundwater potential in an arid region. Environ Monit Assess. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4801-2
Cited by
31 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献