Abstract
AbstractHydrogeochemical processes responsible for groundwater composition within the Asutifi-North district were assessed. The aim was to delineate the factors influencing groundwater within the district. Results show that the pH values of groundwater within the district are moderately acidic to neutral and ranged from 4.4 to 7.5 with a mean value and standard deviation of 6.1 ± 0.7 pH units. 67.4% of groundwater is acidic (pH 4–6.5) due principally to the influence of aquifer materials on the chemistry of groundwater. Acid mine drainage investigations in groundwater within the district shows that, when exposed, sulphides such as pyrites (FeS2) and arsenopyrite (FeAsS) react with water and oxygen to principally produce Fe(OH)3. The major ion concentrations are within the WHO (2004) Guideline values for drinking water. The relative abundance of cations and anions in groundwater within the district is in the order of: Ca2+ > Na+ > Mg2+ > K+ and HCO3− > Cl− > SO42−, respectively. The study further shows that, albite/anorthite-(plagioclase) and calcite/dolomite(carbonates) dissolution as well as ion-exchange reactions may have contributed significantly to major ion concentrations in groundwater within the district. Hydrochemical facies using Piper trillinear diagrams delineated two major water types, the Ca–Mg–HCO3 and Na–Cl water types, with Ca–Mg–Cl, Ca–Mg–SO4–Cl and Na–K–HCO3 as minor water types. Using principal component analysis (PCA), three (3) main principal components accounting for 73.1% of the total variance with eigenvalues > 1 were extracted. PCA delineated the main natural processes through which groundwater within the district acquires its chemical characteristics, the incongruent dissolution of silicate/aluminosilicates and the prevalence of pollution principally from the application of inorganic fertilizers such as nitrates and ammonia via agricultural activities within the district.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. Abidi JH, Farhat B, Mammou AB, Oueslati N (2017) Characterization of recharge mechanisms and sources of groundwater salinization in Ras Jbel coastal aquifer (Northeast Tunisia) using hydrogeochemical tools, environmental isotopes, GIS, and statistics. J Chem (Hindawi) 2017:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8610894
2. Adams S, Tredou G, Harris C, Titus R, Pieterson K (2001) Hydrochemicalcharacteristics of aquifers near Sutherland in the Western Karoo, South Africa. J Hydrol 24:91–103
3. Al-Amry AS (2008) Hydrogeochemisry and groundwater quality assessment in an arid region: a case study from Al Salameh Area, Shabwah, Yemen. In: The 3rd international conference on water resources and arid environments and the 1st Arab water forum
4. Andre L, Franceschi M, Pouchan P, Atteia O (2005) Using geochemical data and modeling to enhance the understanding of groundwater flow in a regional deep aquifer, Aquitaine Basin, south-west of France. J Hydrol 305:40–62
5. APHA-AWWA-WEF (2012) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 22nd edn. American Public Health Association, New York
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献