A Comparison of CPU and GPU Implementations for the LHCb Experiment Run 3 Trigger
-
Published:2021-12-22
Issue:1
Volume:6
Page:
-
ISSN:2510-2036
-
Container-title:Computing and Software for Big Science
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Comput Softw Big Sci
Author:
Aaij R., Adinolfi M., Aiola S., Akar S., Albrecht J., Alexander M., Amato S., Amhis Y., Archilli F., Bala M., Bassi G., Bian L., Blago M. P., Boettcher T., Boldyrev A., Borghi S., Rodriguez A. Brea, Calefice L., Gomez M. Calvo, Pérez D. H. Cámpora, Cardini A., Cattaneo M., Chobanova V., Ciezarek G., Vidal X. Cid, Cobbledick J. L., Coelho J. A. B., Colombo T., Contu A., Couturier B., Craik D. C., Currie R., d’Argent P., De Cian M., Derkach D., Dordei F., Dorigo M., Dufour L., Durante P., Dziurda A., Dzyuba A., Easo S., Esen S., Declara P. Fernandez, Filippov S., Fitzpatrick C., Frank M., Gandini P., Gligorov V. V.ORCID, Golobardes E., Graziani G., Grillo L., Günther P. A., Hansmann-Menzemer S., Hennequin A. M., Henry L., Hill D., Hollitt S. E., Hu J., Hulsbergen W., Hunter R. J., Hushchyn M., Jashal B. K., Jones C. R., Klaver S., Klimaszewski K., Kopecna R., Krzemien W., Kucharczyk M., Lane R., Lazzari F., Gac R. Le, Li P., Lopes J. H., Martinez M. Lucio, Lupato A., Lupton O., Lyu X., Machefert F., Madejczyk O., Malde S., Marchand J. F., Mariani S., Benito C. Marin, Santos D. Martinez, Vidal F. Martinez, Matev R., Mazurek M., Mitreska B., Mitzel D. S., Morello M. J., Mu H., Muzzetto P., Naik P., Needham M., Neri N., Neufeld N., Nolte N. S., O’Hanlon D., Oyanguren A., Altarelli M. Pepe, Petrucci S., Petruzzo M., Pica L., Pisani F., Piucci A., Polci F., Poluektov A., Polycarpo E., Prouve C., Punzi G., Quagliani R., Trejo R. I. Rabadan, Pernas M. Ramos, Rangel M. S., Ratnikov F., Raven G., Reiss F., Renaudin V., Robbe P., Ryzhikov A., Santimaria M., Saur M., Schiller M., Schwemmer R., Sciascia B., Solomin A., Suljik F., Skidmore N., Sokoloff M. D., Spradlin P., Stahl M., Stahl S., Stevens H., Sun L., Szabelski A., Szumlak T., Szymanski M., Tou D. Y., Tuci G., Usachov A., Canudas N. Valls, Gomez R. Vazquez, Vecchi S., Vesterinen M., Vilasis-Cardona X., Bruch D. Vom, Wang Z., Wojton T., Whitehead M., Williams M., Witek M., Xie Y., Xu A., Yin H., Zdybal M., Zenaiev O., Zhang D., Zhang L., Zhu X.,
Abstract
AbstractThe Large Hadron Collider beauty (LHCb) experiment at CERN is undergoing an upgrade in preparation for the Run 3 data collection period at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). As part of this upgrade, the trigger is moving to a full software implementation operating at the LHC bunch crossing rate. We present an evaluation of a CPU-based and a GPU-based implementation of the first stage of the high-level trigger. After a detailed comparison, both options are found to be viable. This document summarizes the performance and implementation details of these options, the outcome of which has led to the choice of the GPU-based implementation as the baseline.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Nuclear and High Energy Physics,Computer Science (miscellaneous),Software
Reference14 articles.
1. LHCb collaboration, Alves Jr AA et al (2008) The LHCb detector at the LHC. JINST 3:S08005, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08005 2. Aaij R et al (2019) Performance of the LHCb trigger and full real-time reconstruction in Run 2 of the LHC. JINST 14:P04013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/14/04/P04013. arXiv:1812.10790 3. Akar S et al (2014) Review document: low level trigger (LLT). CERN, Geneva 4. ATLAS Collaboration (2017) Technical design report for the phase-II upgrade of the ATLAS TDAQ system. CERN, Geneva 5. CMS Collaboration (2017) The Phase-2 Upgrade of the CMS DAQ Interim Technical Design Report, CERN, Geneva. This is the CMS Interim TDR devoted to the upgrade of the CMS DAQ in view of the HL-LHC running, as approved by the LHCC
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|