Setting Health Targets Using Information from Probabilistic Projections: A Research Brief on an Application to Contraceptive Coverage
-
Published:2023-02
Issue:1
Volume:42
Page:
-
ISSN:0167-5923
-
Container-title:Population Research and Policy Review
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Popul Res Policy Rev
Author:
Biddlecom AnnORCID, Sully Elizabeth A.ORCID, Kantorová VladimíraORCID, Wheldon Mark C.ORCID, Lince-Deroche NaomiORCID, Riley TaylorORCID
Abstract
Abstract Broad and aspirational targets to meet health service needs are useful for advocacy, but setting measurable, time-defined targets for accelerated yet feasible progress is necessary for national monitoring and planning purposes. Information from probabilistic projections of health outcomes and service coverage can be used to set country-specific targets that reflect different starting points and rates of change. We show the utility of this approach in an application to contraceptive coverage in 131 low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and the related cost and impact of different coverage scenarios. We use the sustainable development goal (SDG) indicator of the proportion of women who have their need for family planning satisfied with modern contraception. The results show that accelerated progress targets would collectively result in 83% of the need satisfied in 2030 for LMICs, which is 5% points higher than the projected level based on the current pace of progress. This translated into 41 million fewer women with an unmet need for modern methods and 14 million fewer unintended pregnancies. Annual direct costs would be $480 million more in 2030 to support contraceptive services compared with costs in 2030 based on the current pace of progress. As governments plan and budget for expanded health service coverage, information from probabilistic projections can guide them in setting measurable, ambitious yet realistic targets that are relevant to their particular contexts.
Funder
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Demography
Reference21 articles.
1. Bearak, J. M., Popinchalk, A., Ganatra, B., Moller, A.-B., Tunçalp, Ö., Beavin, C., Kwok, L., & Alkema, L. (2020). Unintended pregnancy and abortion by income, region, and the legal status of abortion: Estimates from a comprehensive model for 1990–2019. The Lancet Global Health, 8(9), E1152–E1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30315-6 2. Bearak, J. M., Popinchalk, A., Beavin, C., Ganatra, B., Moller, A.-B., Tunçalp, Ö., & Alkema, L. (2022). Country-specific estimates of unintended pregnancy and abortion incidence: A global comparative analysis of levels in 2015–2019. BMJ Global Health, 7, e007151. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007151 3. Cahill, N., Weinberger, M., & Alkema, L. (2020). What increase in modern contraceptive use is needed in FP2020 countries to reach 75% demand satisfied by 2030? An assessment using the accelerated transition method and family planning estimation model. Gates Open Research, 4, 113. https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.13125.1 4. Choi, Y., Fabic, M. S., Hounton, S., & Koroma, D. (2015). Meeting demand for family planning within a generation: Prospects and implications at country level. Global Health Action, 8, 29734. https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v8.29734 5. Eyal, N., & Sjöstrand, M. (2020). On knowingly setting unrealistic goals in public health. American Journal of Public Health, 110(4), 480–484. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2019.305428
|
|