A Prospective Cohort Study of Changes in Access to Contraceptive Care and Use Two Years after Iowa Medicaid Coverage Restrictions at Abortion-Providing Facilities Went into Effect

Author:

Kavanaugh Megan L.ORCID,Zolna Mia,Pliskin Emma,MacFarlane Katrina

Abstract

AbstractInequities in access to contraception based on ability to pay can interfere with individuals’ reproductive autonomy. This study examines the impact of a 2017 state-level policy in Iowa restricting Medicaid coverage at abortion-providing health care centers on patients’ access to contraceptive care and subsequent contraceptive use. We draw on a unique panel dataset of individuals who originally sought care at a publicly supported family planning site in Iowa in 2018–2019 and then participated in subsequent follow-up surveys every 6 months for 2 years to examine an effect of access to care on contraceptive use. Among our final analytic sample of 368 individuals, our findings indicate that receipt of recent contraceptive care decreased over the study period; this coincided with patients shifting away from getting contraceptive care at sites potentially impacted by the 2017 Iowa Medicaid policy restriction while those getting this care at non-impacted sites remained relatively steady over the study period. At the same time, nonuse of contraception increased while use of a contraceptive method that carries cost, use of a provider-involved method, and satisfaction with one’s method decreased. We find that, after controlling for patient characteristics, those who shifted toward receiving contraceptive care experienced increases in these three contraceptive outcomes. We interpret this as preliminary descriptive evidence demonstrating an impact of disruptions in access to contraceptive care on contraceptive outcomes. Supportive payment and funding strategies for contraception, rather than policies that impede or restrict access, are needed to enable people to realize full reproductive autonomy.

Funder

William and Flora Hewlett Foundation

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Demography

Reference46 articles.

1. American Public Health Association. (2015). Restricted access to abortion violates human rights, precludes reproductive justice, and demands public health intervention (Policy Statement). https://www.apha.org/policies-and-advocacy/public-health-policy-statements/policy-database/2016/01/04/11/24/restricted-access-to-abortion-violates-human-rights. Accesssed 11 Jan 2021.

2. Becker, N. V., Keating, N. L., & Pace, L. E. (2021). ACA mandate led to substantial increase in contraceptive use among women enrolled in high-deductible health plans. Health Affairs, 40(4), 579–586. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01710

3. Burke, K. L., Potter, J. E., & White, K. (2020). Unsatisfied contraceptive preferences due to cost among women in the United States. Contraception: X, 2, 100032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conx.2020.100032

4. Butz, D. A. (2018). Enrollment down for Iowa family planning program. AP NEWS. Newspaper. https://apnews.com/article/c9aada1fbaa445a7b2ac286c6620b893. Accessed 10 June 2021

5. Chakraborty, P., Gallo, M. F., Nawaz, S., Smith, M. H., Hood, R. B., Chettri, S., et al. (2021). Use of nonpreferred contraceptive methods among women in Ohio. Contraception, 103(5), 328–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2021.02.006

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3