Abstract
AbstractIn 2006, the Quebec government implemented a parental leave program more generous than the scheme available through the Canadian federal Employment Insurance (EI) program. It was aimed at maintaining the personal disposable income after a birth, especially for women whose income exceeds the maximum insurable earnings of EI. In this article, we assess whether the implementation of the Quebec Parental Insurance Plan (QPIP) was associated with an increase in the fertility in Quebec, especially for highly educated women. We use data from the rotating panels of the Canadian Labor Force Survey. We test the effect of the implementation of the QPIP on fertility by comparing Quebec and Ontario, which kept the federal EI scheme, before and after the implementation of the QPIP. We adapt the difference in differences method (DiD) to the modeling of the fertility schedule using Poisson regression. We estimate fertility by educational levels within each of the four groups of the DiD design by integrating the estimated fertility schedules. Our results show that the implementation of the QPIP was associated with an increase in fertility in Quebec. The magnitude of the increase varies by educational levels: 17% for women who did not complete secondary education, 46% for those who completed it, and 27% for women who earned a university diploma.
Funder
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference50 articles.
1. Bassford, M., & Fisher, H. (2020). The impact of paid parental leave on fertility intentions. The Economic Record, 96(315), 402–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4932.12561
2. Beauchemin, S. (2016). La naissance d’un régime. Entre débats politiques et débats juridiques. In Beauchemin, S. (Ed.), Retombées économiques et sociales du régime québécois d’assurance parentale. Bilan de dix années d’existence (pp. 14–16). Gouvernement du Québec, Conseil de gestion de l’assurance parentale. http://www.cgap.gouv.qc.ca/publications/pdf/Bilan_Intro.pdf
3. Beaujot, R., Du, C. J., & Ravanera, Z. (2013). Family policies in Quebec and the Rest of Canada. Implications for fertility, child-care, women’s paid work, and child development indicators. Canadian Public Policy, 39(2), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.3138/CPP.39.2.221
4. Becker, G. S. (1985). Human capital, effort, and the sexual division of labor. Journal of Labor Economics, 3(1), S33–S58. https://doi.org/10.1086/298075
5. Bein, C., Gauthier, A. H., & Mynarska, M. (2021). Religiosity and fertility intentions. Can the gender regime explain cross-country differences? European Journal of Population, 37(2), 443–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-020-09574-w
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献