Universal Transfers, Tax Breaks and Fertility: Evidence from a Regional Reform in Norway
-
Published:2023-05-23
Issue:3
Volume:42
Page:
-
ISSN:0167-5923
-
Container-title:Population Research and Policy Review
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Popul Res Policy Rev
Author:
Hart Rannveig KaldagerORCID, Galloway Taryn A.
Abstract
AbstractThe relatively high fertility in the Nordic countries has attracted considerable academic and political interest. Still, the causal relationship between economic circumstances and fertility in the Nordic context is poorly understood. This paper estimates the effect of tax breaks and universal transfers on fertility in the Nordic context. We analyze the fertility effects of a regional child benefit and tax reform implemented in the northern municipalities of the Norwegian county Troms, using the southern municipalities of the same county as a plausible and empirically similar control group. We use a difference-in-difference/event study design, and estimate multivariate models on individual-level data from administrative registers for the full population. The reform increased fertility among women in their early 20 s. The effects are concentrated among unmarried women, who received the largest subsidies. Our findings suggest that favorable economic conditions have contributed to the relatively high fertility in the Nordic countries.
Funder
Norges Forskningsråd Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Demography
Reference66 articles.
1. Aassve, A., Cavalli, N., Mencarini, L., Plach, S., & Bacci, M. L. (2020). The covid-19 pandemic and human fertility. Science, 369(6502), 370–371. 2. Andersen, S. N., Drange, N., & Lappegård, T. (2018). Can a cash transfer to families change fertility behaviour? Demographic Research, 38, 897–928. 3. Ang, X. L. (2015). The effects of cash transfer fertility incentives and parental leave benefits on fertility and labor supply: evidence from two natural experiments. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 36(2), 263–288. 4. Angell, E., Eikeland, S., Grufeld, L. A., Lie, I., Myhr, S., Nygaard, V., & Pedersen, P. (2012). The action zone in troms and finnmark: Development and evaluation of policies. Technical Report, 2, 10. 5. Angrist, J. D., & Evans, W. N. (1996). Children and their parents’ labor supply: Evidence from exogenous variation in family size. The American Economic Review, 88(3), 450–477.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|