Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference8 articles.
1. Xue H, Tu Y, Ma T, Wen T, Yang T, Cai M (2017) Up to twelve year follow-up of the Oxford phase three unicompartmental knee replacement in China: seven hundred and eight knees from an independent centre. Int Orthop 41(8):1571–1577
2. Bitsch RG, von Keudell A, Losina E, Fitz W (2013) Good accuracy of the Phase III Oxford Mobile Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Instrumentation. Acta Orthop 84(4):406–409
3. Koh IJ, Kim JH, Jang SW, Kim MS, Kim C, In Y (2016) Are the Oxford(®) medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty new instruments reducing the bearing dislocation risk while improving components relationships? A case control study. Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research: OTSR. ;102(2):183 – 87
4. ZimmerBiomet Oxford Partial Knee Microplasty Instrumentation Surgical Technique. https://www.zimmerbiomet.com/content/dam/zimmer-biomet/medical-professionals/000-surgical-techniques/knee/oxford-partial-knee-microplasty-instrumentation-surgical-technique.pdf. Accessed 15.5.2022.
5. ZimmerBiomet Radiographic Assessment for Medial Oxford Partial Knee Replacement. https://www.oxfordpartialknee.net/content/dam/zb-minisites/oxford-partial-knee-hcp/documents/oxford-decision-aid-flyer.pdf. Accessed 25.9.2021.