Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Indications for reverse shoulder arthroplasties (rTSA) have increased since their development by Paul Grammont in 1985. Prosthesis design was enhanced over time, but the management of the tendon of the M. subscapularis (SSC-tendon) in primary rTSA is still a controversial subject with regard to perform a refixation or not.
Methods
50 patients were randomized in a refixation group (A) and a non-refixation-group (B) of the SSC-tendon in a double-blinded fashion. SSC-function was assessed at baseline before surgery, such as 3 and 12 months after surgery. Constant–Murley-Shoulder Score (CS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES), strength, range of motion (ROM), and pain on numeric rating scale (NRS) were measured in all examinations. An ultrasound examination of the shoulder was performed for evaluation of subscapularis tendon integrity at 3 and 12 month follow-up visits. Pain was evaluated on NRS via phone 5 days after surgery. Surgery was performed by a single experienced senior surgeon in all patients.
Results
Patients with a refixation of the SSC-tendon and primary rTSA had improved internal rotation [40° (20°–60°) vs. 32° (20°–45°); p = 0.03] at 12 months of follow-up. Additionally, the A-group had increased CS [74 (13–90) vs. 69.5 (40–79); p = 0.029] 1 year after surgery. Results were strengthened by subgroup analysis of successful refixation in ultrasound examination vs. no refixation. No differences were seen in ASES and NRS 1 year after rTSA.
Conclusion
SSC-tendon repair in rTSA improves CS and internal rotation 12 months after surgery.
Funder
Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,General Medicine,Surgery,Surgery
Reference47 articles.
1. Thon SG, Seidl AJ, Bravman JT et al (2020) Advances and update on reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 13:11–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-019-09582-2
2. Flurin P-H, Roche CP, Wright TW et al (2015) A comparison and correlation of clinical outcome metrics in anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013) 73(Suppl 1):S118–S123
3. Wall B, Nové-Josserand L, O’Connor DP et al (2007) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a review of results according to etiology. J Bone Jt Surg Am 89:1476–1485. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.00666
4. Rugg CM, Coughlan MJ, Lansdown DA (2019) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: biomechanics and indications. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 12:542–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-019-09586-y
5. Kiet TK, Feeley BT, Naimark M et al (2015) Outcomes after shoulder replacement: comparison between reverse and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 24:179–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.06.039
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献