Clinical relevance of roll-back replacement of ultra congruent total knee arthroplasty: comparison of mid-term outcomes with posterior stabilizing design-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Clinical relevance of roll-back replacement of ultra congruent total knee arthroplasty: comparison of mid-term outcomes with posterior stabilizing design

Published:2023-07-24 Issue:11 Volume:143 Page:6805-6813
ISSN:1434-3916
Container-title:Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
language:en
Short-container-title:Arch Orthop Trauma Surg

Author:

Yoo Hyun Jin,Kim Yong Beom,Jeong Ho Won,Park Sung Bae,Nam Hee Seung,Lee Yong Seuk^ORCID

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,General Medicine,Surgery,Surgery

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-023-04918-7.pdf

Reference25 articles.

1. Bae JH, Yoon JR, Sung JH, Shin YS (2018) Posterior-stabilized inserts are preferable to cruciate-substituting ultracongruent inserts due to more favourable kinematics and stability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26(11):3300–3310

2. Carvalho LH Jr, Temponi EF, Soares LF, Goncalves MJ (2014) Relationship between range of motion and femoral rollback in total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 48(1):1–5

3. Chang MJ, Kang SB, Chang CB et al (2020) Posterior condylar offset changes and its effect on clinical outcomes after posterior-substituting, fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: anterior versus posterior referencing. Knee Surg Relat Res 32(1):10

4. Charette RS, Sheth NP, Boettner F, Scuderi GR, Melnic CM (2018) Femoral component sizing during total knee arthroplasty: anterior versus posterior referencing. JBJS Rev 6(1):e4

5. Fritzsche H, Beyer F, Postler A, Lutzner J (2018) Different intraoperative kinematics, stability, and range of motion between cruciate-substituting ultracongruent and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26(5):1465–1470