Abstract
AbstractThe present study examines the measurement property of instructional quality in mathematics education, building on data from teachers and students, by combing TALIS 2013 and PISA 2012 linkage data from seven countries. Confirmatory factor analysis was applied to examine the dimensionality of the construct instructional quality in mathematics instruction. Three dimensions were identified (i.e., classroom disciplinary climate, teacher support, and cognitive activation) when building on teacher data from TALIS. This three-dimensional model did not fit all countries. When analyzing PISA data, the same three dimensions could be identified, but two additional dimensions appeared: classroom management and student-orientated instruction. This five-dimensional factor structure reflected metric invariance across all countries. The findings imply that students and teachers seem to hold different perceptions about mathematics instructional quality reflect different dimensions. These differences seem to vary within and between countries. This implies that care should be taken when using the construct as an equivalent measure of instructional quality when studying school effectiveness in mathematics education across countries.
Funder
China Scholarship Council
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
University of Oslo
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education
Reference116 articles.
1. Aditomo, A., & Köhler, C. (2020). Do student ratings provide reliable and valid information about teaching quality at the school level? Evaluating measures of science teaching in pisa 2015. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 32(3), 275–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09328-6
2. Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (2001). Introduction to measurement theory. Waveland Press.
3. Andersone, R., & Černova, E. (2007). Latvia. The education systems of Europe (pp. 418–437). Springer.
4. Anghileri, J. (2006). Scaffolding practices that enhance mathematics learning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(1), 33–52.
5. Atlay, C., Tieben, N., Hillmert, S., & Fauth, B. (2019). Instructional quality and achievement inequality: How effective is teaching in closing the social achievement gap? Learning and Instruction, 63, 101211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.05.008
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献