1. Abrahamson, D., Chase, K., Kumar, V., & Jain, R. (2014). Leveling transparency via situated, intermediary learning objectives. In J. L. Polman, E. A. Kyza, D. K. O'Neill, I. Tabak, W. R. Penuel, A. S. Jurow, K. O'Connor, et al. (Eds.), Learning and becoming in practice. In Proceedings of Learning and Becoming in Practice, the 11th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2014) (Vol. 1, pp. 23–30). Boulder, CO: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
2. Abrahamson, D., & Shulman, A. (2017). Constructing movement in mathematics and dance: An interdisciplinary pedagogical dialogue on subjectivity and awareness. Paper presented at the 1st annual meeting of Movement: Brain, Body, Cognition, Oxford, UK, July 9–11. Accessed 02 Nov 2017 at
https://edrl.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/2017-07/Abrahamson.Shulman.MOVEMENT2017.pdf
.
3. Bakker, A., & Derry, J. (2011). Lessons from inferentialism for statistics education. In K. Makar & D. Ben-Zvi (Eds.), The role of context in developing students’ reasoning about informal statistical inference [Special issue]. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 13(1–2), 5–26.
4. Bamberger, J., & Schön, D. A. (1983). Learning as reflective conversation with materials: Notes from work in progress. Art Education, 36(2), 68–73.
5. Bamberger, J., & Schön, D. A. (1991). Learning as reflective conversation with materials. In F. Steier (Ed.), Research and reflexivity (pp. 186–209). London: SAGE Publications.