Scientific policy advice on sustainable development: lessons learned from the Dialogue between Scientific Councils in Germany

Author:

Sokolovska NataliiaORCID,Ellersiek AnneORCID,Fecher BenediktORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis paper presents an in-depth case study about the Dialogue between Scientific Councils, also referred to as the Beirätedialog, which is a format for cross-sectoral science policy consulting on sustainable development in Germany. Set up to address current trends, it is designed to facilitate deliberation and collective knowledge creation between scientists and policymakers. Based on 4 years of participatory observation, we analyze to what extent this goal can be achieved and present some empirical insights about the main difficulties that occurred. We argue that creating a space for interaction does not guarantee collective knowledge production and identify key learnings that can help design such a process. In support of the growing interest in communication at the intersection of science and policymaking, our research seeks to deepen the understanding of the dynamics of co-creative processes and offer some insights on how to overcome the main challenges.

Funder

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference70 articles.

1. Adler PA, Adler P (1994) Observational techniques. In: Handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, US, pp 377–392

2. Asselt M (2000) Perspectives on uncertainty and risk, in: Perspectives on uncertainty and risk. Springer, pp 407–417

3. Beisheim M. (2019) HLPF2019 [WWW Document]. Wissenschaftsplattform nachhaltigkeit 2030. URL https://www.wpn2030.de/hlpf2019/ (accessed 9.26.22).

4. Bergmann M, Brohmann B, Hoffmann E, Loibl MC, Rehaag R, Schramm E, Voß JP (2005) Quality criteria of transdisciplinary research. A guide for the formative evaluation of research projects. ISOE-Studientexte, p 13

5. Bergmann M et al (2021) transdisciplinary sustainability research in real-world labs: success factors and methods for change. Sustain Sci 16(2):541–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00886-8

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3