Abstract
AbstractThis paper presents an in-depth case study about the Dialogue between Scientific Councils, also referred to as the Beirätedialog, which is a format for cross-sectoral science policy consulting on sustainable development in Germany. Set up to address current trends, it is designed to facilitate deliberation and collective knowledge creation between scientists and policymakers. Based on 4 years of participatory observation, we analyze to what extent this goal can be achieved and present some empirical insights about the main difficulties that occurred. We argue that creating a space for interaction does not guarantee collective knowledge production and identify key learnings that can help design such a process. In support of the growing interest in communication at the intersection of science and policymaking, our research seeks to deepen the understanding of the dynamics of co-creative processes and offer some insights on how to overcome the main challenges.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference70 articles.
1. Adler PA, Adler P (1994) Observational techniques. In: Handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, US, pp 377–392
2. Asselt M (2000) Perspectives on uncertainty and risk, in: Perspectives on uncertainty and risk. Springer, pp 407–417
3. Beisheim M. (2019) HLPF2019 [WWW Document]. Wissenschaftsplattform nachhaltigkeit 2030. URL https://www.wpn2030.de/hlpf2019/ (accessed 9.26.22).
4. Bergmann M, Brohmann B, Hoffmann E, Loibl MC, Rehaag R, Schramm E, Voß JP (2005) Quality criteria of transdisciplinary research. A guide for the formative evaluation of research projects. ISOE-Studientexte, p 13
5. Bergmann M et al (2021) transdisciplinary sustainability research in real-world labs: success factors and methods for change. Sustain Sci 16(2):541–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00886-8