Abstract
AbstractPlastics and their associated chemical pollution have emerged as a global threat. This recognition materialized in March 2022 with the adoption of a groundbreaking mandate among United Nations (UN) Member States, signaling the commencement of negotiations for a comprehensive treaty aimed at ending plastic pollution, encompassing the entire lifecycle. The first session of negotiations convened at the International Negotiating Committee (INC-1) in Punta del Este, Uruguay from November 28th–December 2nd, 2022, from there, four other negotiation sessions have either convened or will, with the expected conclusion in December 2024. The current study introduces a methodology for systematically observing and documenting global agreement-making. It utilizes a dataset from the first session of negotiations to explore the event ethnography (EE) methodology for following Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEA). This paper aims to inspire and guide researchers in employing EE, recognizing its efficacy in navigating the complexities of the extensive Global Plastics Treaty (GPT) negotiations and promoting collaborative efforts for a comprehensive understanding of the process. EE is a method increasingly recognised to study multilateral international negotiations within the science-policy nexus to examine emerging obstacles, trends, power dynamics, and actors (both state and non-state) in action within the negotiations. Finally, a dataset is presented from INC-1 through a practical Excel document; the article then demonstrates one example of how the dataset can be employed to enhance comprehension of the negotiators and observers influencing the GPT negotiations.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference37 articles.
1. Adler-Nissen R, Drieschova A (2019) Track-change diplomacy: technology, affordances, and the practice of international negotiations. Int Stud Quart 63(3):531–545. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqz030
2. Barboza LGA, Cózar A, Gimenez BC, Barros TL, Kershaw PJ, Guilhermino L (2019) Macroplastics pollution in the marine environment. In World seas: An environmental evaluation. Academic Press, pp 305–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-805052-1.00019-X1
3. Bergmann M, Almroth BC, Brander SM, Dey T, Green DS, Gundogdu S, Krieger A, Wagner M, Walker TR (2022) A global plastic treaty must cap production. Science 376(6592):469–470. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abq0082
4. Brosius JP, Campbell LM (2010) Collaborative event ethnography: conservation and development trade-offs at the fourth world conservation congress. Conserv Soc 8(4):245–255. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4923.78141
5. Bruggers J (2023) ‘Biden administration’s global plastic plan dubbed “low ambition” and “underwhelming”’, 28 February 2023. https://insideclimatenews.org/news/28022023/biden-united-nations-global-plastics-treaty/
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献