Abstract
AbstractDue to the rise of user-generated content, social media is increasingly adopted as a channel to deliver customer service. Given the public character of online platforms, the automatic detection of emotions forms an important application in monitoring customer satisfaction and preventing negative word-of-mouth. This paper introduces EmoTwiCS, a corpus of 9489 Dutch customer service dialogues on Twitter that are annotated for emotion trajectories. In our business-oriented corpus, we view emotions as dynamic attributes of the customer that can change at each utterance of the conversation. The term ‘emotion trajectory’ refers therefore not only to the fine-grained emotions experienced by customers (annotated with 28 labels and valence-arousal-dominance scores), but also to the event happening prior to the conversation and the responses made by the human operator (both annotated with 8 categories). Inter-annotator agreement (IAA) scores on the resulting dataset are substantial and comparable with related research, underscoring its high quality. Given the interplay between the different layers of annotated information, we perform several in-depth analyses to investigate (i) static emotions in isolated tweets, (ii) dynamic emotions and their shifts in trajectory, and (iii) the role of causes and response strategies in emotion trajectories. We conclude by listing the advantages and limitations of our dataset, after which we give some suggestions on the different types of predictive modelling tasks and open research questions to which EmoTwiCS can be applied. The dataset is made publicly available at https://lt3.ugent.be/resources/emotwics.
Funder
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Departement Economie, Wetenschap en Innovatie
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Linguistics and Language,Education,Language and Linguistics
Reference94 articles.
1. Antoine, J.Y., Villaneau, J., & Lefeuvre, A. (2014). Weighted Krippendorff’s alpha is a more reliable metrics for multi-coders ordinal annotations: experimental studies on emotion, opinion and coreference annotation. In: Proceedings of the 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 550–559.
2. Berger, J., Humphreys, A., Ludwig, S., Moe, W. W., Netzer, O., & Schweidel, D. A. (2020). Uniting the tribes: using text for marketing insight. Journal of Marketing, 84(1), 1–25.
3. Bothe, C., Weber, C., Magg, S., & Wermter, S. (2020). EDA: Enriching Emotional Dialogue Acts using an Ensemble of Neural Annotators. In: Proceedings of the 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, European Language Resources Association, pp 620–627.
4. Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25(1), 49–59.
5. Buechel, S., & Hahn, U. (2017). Readers vs. Writers vs. texts: coping with different perspectives of text understanding in emotion annotation. In: Proceedings of the 11th Linguistic Annotation Workshop, Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 1–12.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献