Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
To critically illustrate the personal experience with using the “Remote Check” application which remotely monitors the hearing rehabilitation level of cochlear implant users at home and further allows clinicians to schedule in-clinic sessions according to the patients’ needs.
Methods
12-month prospective study. Eighty adult cochlear implant users (females n = 37, males n = 43; age range 20–77 years) with ≥ 36 months of cochlear implant experience and ≥ 12 months of stable auditory and speech recognition level volunteered for this 12-month long prospective study. For each patient, at the beginning of the study during the in-clinic session to assess the stable aided hearing thresholds and the cochlear implant integrity and patient’s usage, the “Remote Check” assessment baseline values were obtained. “Remote Check” outcomes were collected at different times in the subsequent at-home sessions, to identify the patients that had to reach the Center. Chi-square test has been used for statistical analysis of the comparison of the “Remote Check” outcomes and in-clinic session results.
Results
“Remote Check” application outcomes demonstrated minimal or no differences between all sessions. The at-home Remote Check application reached the same clinical outcomes as the in-clinic sessions in 79 out 80 of participants (99%) with high statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Conclusions
“Remote Check” application supported hearing monitoring in cochlear implant users that were not able to attend the in-clinic review during COVID-19 pandemic time. This study demonstrates that the application can be a useful routine tool also for clinical follow-up of cochlear implant users with stable aided hearing.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Verona
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Medicine,Otorhinolaryngology
Reference20 articles.
1. Howe S, Mawman D (2015) Audit of adult post-implant annual reviews and evaluation of patient-led review. Cochlear Implants Int 16(1):3–8
2. Rooth M, King ER, Dillon M et al (2017) Management considerations for cochlear implant recipients in their 80s and 90s. Hear Rev 24:28–30
3. Ayas M, Ali Al Amadi AMH, Khaled D et al (2020) Impact of COVID-19 on the access to hearing health care services for children with cochlear implants: a survey of parents. Research 9:690
4. Bradford N, Caffery L, Smith A (2016) Telehealth services in rural and remote Australia: a systematic review of models of care and factors influencing success and sustainability. Rural Remote Health 16:3808
5. Thai-Van H, Bakhos D, Bouccara D et al (2021) Telemedicine in Audiology. Best practice recommendations from the French Society of Audiology (SFA) and the French Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (SFORL). Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 138:363–375
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献