A validation study of the 30-day questionnaire in the national Norwegian Tonsil Surgery Register: can we trust the data reported by the patients?

Author:

Wennberg SiriORCID,Amundsen Marit Furre,Bugten VegardORCID

Abstract

Abstract Purpose The aim of this study was to validate the Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) in the Norwegian Tonsil Surgery Register (NTSR) and to examine whether any improvements to the questionnaire could be useful. Methods This is a prospective, descriptive study. NTSR collects data from patients who undergo tonsil surgery and the intention of the register is to improve the quality of treatment and to contribute to research. The patients answers questions about admission due to postoperative haemorrhage, infection and pain 30 days after surgery. 305 patients were contacted on phone 1–2 weeks after answering the questionnaires electronically (ePROM) and asked the same questions. 180 of 305 patients we contacted had some kind of complications after surgery. They were asked additional questions to search for possible points for improvement of the questionnaire. Results When comparing the results on the ePROM with the answers on phone, we found that 12 out of 14 variables achieve almost perfect agreement (AC1 ≥ 0.81). Two variables are categorized to be substantial agreement (AC1 = 0.61–0.80). The additional questions showed us that the questionnaire can be improved with more detailed information regarding the severity of the postoperative haemorrhage and the need of better treatment against postoperative pain. Conclusion This study shows that the information from the 30-day ePROM has high reliability. The questions were understood as they were intended, and the answers reflect what the patients had of complications. Some changes can be done to improve the questionnaire and to open up for more research around the tonsillectomy procedure.

Funder

Fakultet for medisin og helsevitenskap, Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet

NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Medicine,Otorhinolaryngology

Reference31 articles.

1. Solomon DJ, Henry RC, Hogan JG, Van Amburg GH, Taylor J (1991) Evaluation and implementation of public health registries. Public Health Rep 106(2):142–150

2. Odhagen E, Sunnergren O, Söderman AH, Thor J, Stalfors J (2018) Reducing post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage rates through a quality improvement project using a Swedish National quality register: a case study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 275(6):1631–1639

3. EyeNet Sweden (2015) Handbook-for_establishing-quality_registries_2005. Available from: http://rcsyd.se/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Handbook-for_establishing-quality_registries_2005_1st_Edition.pdf. Accessed 29 Aug 2023

4. Nasjonalt servicemiljø for medisinske kvalitetsregistre. Available from: https://www.kvalitetsregistre.no/kontakt-nasjonalt-servicemiljo. Accessed 29 Aug 2023

5. Ruohoalho J, Østvoll E, Bratt M, Bugten V, Bäck L, Mäkitie A, Ovesen T, Stalfors J (2018) Systematic review of tonsil surgery quality registers and introduction of the Nordic Tonsil Surgery Register Collaboration. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 275(6):1353–1363

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3