Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this study was to validate the Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) in the Norwegian Tonsil Surgery Register (NTSR) and to examine whether any improvements to the questionnaire could be useful.
Methods
This is a prospective, descriptive study. NTSR collects data from patients who undergo tonsil surgery and the intention of the register is to improve the quality of treatment and to contribute to research. The patients answers questions about admission due to postoperative haemorrhage, infection and pain 30 days after surgery. 305 patients were contacted on phone 1–2 weeks after answering the questionnaires electronically (ePROM) and asked the same questions. 180 of 305 patients we contacted had some kind of complications after surgery. They were asked additional questions to search for possible points for improvement of the questionnaire.
Results
When comparing the results on the ePROM with the answers on phone, we found that 12 out of 14 variables achieve almost perfect agreement (AC1 ≥ 0.81). Two variables are categorized to be substantial agreement (AC1 = 0.61–0.80). The additional questions showed us that the questionnaire can be improved with more detailed information regarding the severity of the postoperative haemorrhage and the need of better treatment against postoperative pain.
Conclusion
This study shows that the information from the 30-day ePROM has high reliability. The questions were understood as they were intended, and the answers reflect what the patients had of complications. Some changes can be done to improve the questionnaire and to open up for more research around the tonsillectomy procedure.
Funder
Fakultet for medisin og helsevitenskap, Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet
NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Medicine,Otorhinolaryngology
Reference31 articles.
1. Solomon DJ, Henry RC, Hogan JG, Van Amburg GH, Taylor J (1991) Evaluation and implementation of public health registries. Public Health Rep 106(2):142–150
2. Odhagen E, Sunnergren O, Söderman AH, Thor J, Stalfors J (2018) Reducing post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage rates through a quality improvement project using a Swedish National quality register: a case study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 275(6):1631–1639
3. EyeNet Sweden (2015) Handbook-for_establishing-quality_registries_2005. Available from: http://rcsyd.se/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Handbook-for_establishing-quality_registries_2005_1st_Edition.pdf. Accessed 29 Aug 2023
4. Nasjonalt servicemiljø for medisinske kvalitetsregistre. Available from: https://www.kvalitetsregistre.no/kontakt-nasjonalt-servicemiljo. Accessed 29 Aug 2023
5. Ruohoalho J, Østvoll E, Bratt M, Bugten V, Bäck L, Mäkitie A, Ovesen T, Stalfors J (2018) Systematic review of tonsil surgery quality registers and introduction of the Nordic Tonsil Surgery Register Collaboration. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 275(6):1353–1363
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献