Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Removal of the current calcium alginate packing materials to the middle meatus in endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is usually accompanied by discomfort or pain owing to the hard and brittle nature of these materials. Plus moist HS-W® is a new calcium alginate packing material released in 2022 developed to overcome this issue by changing the uronic acid component. We aimed to compare the discomfort/pain during the removal of Plus moist HS-W® with Kaltostat®, as well as their suitability as packing materials in ESS.
Methods
Kaltostat® and Plus moist HS-W® were used as packing materials in 22 and 21 patients who underwent ESS in 2021 and 2022, respectively. Patients were asked to rate the pain during the packing removal 10 days after ESS using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). The ratio of residual packing materials, number of suctions (insertions/extractions of the suction cannula), and time required to remove packing materials were measured. Postoperative complications such as hemorrhage, local infection, lateralization of the middle turbinate, and synechia of the middle meatus were also evaluated.
Results
The Plus moist HS-W® group exhibited significantly lower NRS pain scores, a lower ratio of residual packing materials, a reduced number of suctions, and a shorter time required to remove the packing. No obvious postoperative complications occurred in both groups except for one suspicious case of a slight infection in the Kaltostat® group.
Conclusion
Compared with Kaltostat®, Plus moist HS-W®, characterized by better gelatinization than Kaltostat®, benefits patients by minimizing discomfort/pain during removal.
Level of evidence
Level 3.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference22 articles.
1. Weitzel EK, Wormald PJ (2008) A scientific review of middle meatal packing/stents. Am J Rhinol 22:302–307. https://doi.org/10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3171
2. Chevillard C, Rugina M, Bonfils P, Bougara A, Castillo L, Crampette L, Pandraud L, Samardzic M, Peynègre R (2006) Evaluation of calcium alginate nasal packing (Algostéril) versus Polyvinyl acetal (merocel) for nasal packing after inferior turbinate resection. Rhinology 44:58–61
3. Romano A, Salzano G, Dell’AversanaOrabona G, Cama A, Petrocelli M, Piombino P, Schonauer F, Iaconetta G, Salzano FA, Califano L (2016) Comparative study between biodegradable nasopore (BNP) and Merocel hemox 10 cm after septo-turbinoplasty procedure. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 21:669–673
4. Titirungruang CK, Charakorn N, Chaitusaney B, Hirunwiwatkul P (2021) Is postoperative nasal packing after septoplasty safe? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Rhinology 59:340–351. https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin21.057
5. World Health Organization (2018) Global guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infection. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK536404
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献