Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Cochlear implantation is a standard approach to hearing rehabilitation and encompasses three main stages: appropriate patient selection, a challenging surgical procedure, which should be as atraumatic as possible and preserve cochlear structures, and lifelong postoperative follow-up. Computed tomography (CT) is performed to assess postoperative implant position. The Siemens Advanced Radar Target Identification System (ARTIS) Pheno provides fluoroscopic imaging during surgery and has so far been mainly used by cardiologists, neurosurgeons and trauma surgeons.
Methods
Six patients with difficult anatomy or a challenging medical history were selected for a surgical procedure, during which we planned to use the ARTIS Pheno to accurately position and assess implant position under fluoroscopy during and immediately after surgery. In all six cases, the ARTIS Pheno was used directly in the surgical setting. The procedures were performed in cooperation with the neuroradiology department in an interdisciplinary manner.
Results
In all six patients, fluoroscopy was used to visualise the procedure at different stages of surgery. In five patients, the procedure was successfully completed. This approach allowed us to finally assess implant position and confirm the correct and complete insertion of the electrode while the patient was still under anaesthesia.
Conclusion
These cases showed positive surgical outcomes. Although the procedure is more complex than a standard approach, patients can be managed in a safe, effective and appropriate manner. The assessment of implant position in real time during surgery leads to greater patient and surgeon satisfaction. The approach presented here ensures a high quality of cochlear implant surgery even in difficult surgical situations and meets the requirements of modern surgery.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference20 articles.
1. Schipper J, Klenzner T, Aschendorff A, Arapakis I, Ridder GJ, Laszig R (2004) Navigation-controlled cochleostomy. Is an improvement in the quality of results for cochlear implant surgery possible? HNO 52(4):329–335
2. Arney D, Goldman JM, Bhargav-Spantzel A, Basu A, Taborn M, Pappas G et al (2012) Simulation of medical device network performance and requirements for an integrated clinical environment. Biomed Instrum Technol 46(4):308–315
3. Budde C, Lissat A, Brüning R (2018) “iDoc”: Unterstützung, aber kein Ersatz. Dtsch Arztebl 115(26):1062–1064
4. Sharma A, Harrington RA, McClellan MB, Turakhia MP, Eapen ZJ, Steinhubl S et al (2018) Using digital health technology to better generate evidence and deliver evidence-based care. J Am Coll Cardiol 71(23):2680–2690
5. Franke S, Rockstroh M, Schreiber E, Neumann J, Neumuth T. Context-aware medical assistance systems in integrated surgical environments. 28th Conference of the International Society for Medical Innovation and Technology (SMIT); 2016.