Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
In unilateral cochlear implant (CI) recipients, a contralateral routing of signals (CROS) device enables to receive auditory information from the unaided side. This study investigates the feasibility as well as subjective and objective benefits of using a CI processor as a CROS device in unilateral CI recipients.
Methods
This is a single-center, prospective cohort study. First, we tested the directionality of the CROS processor in an acoustic chamber. Second, we examined the difference of speech perception in quiet and in noise in ten unilateral CI recipients with and without the CROS processor. Third, subjective ratings with the CROS processor were evaluated according to the Client Oriented Scale of Improvement Questionnaire.
Results
There was a time delay between the two devices of 3 ms. Connection of the CROS processor led to a summation effect of 3 dB as well as a more constant amplification along all azimuths. Speech perception in quiet showed an increased word recognition score at 50 dB (mean improvement 7%). In noise, the head shadow effect could be mitigated with significant gain in speech perception (mean improvement 8.4 dB). This advantage was reversed in unfavorable listening situations, where the CROS device considerably amplified the noise (mean: – 4.8 dB). Subjectively, patients who did not normally wear a hearing aid on the non-CI side were satisfied with the CROS device.
Conclusions
The connection and synchronization of a CI processor as a CROS device is technically feasible and the signal processing strategies of the device can be exploited. In contra-laterally unaided patients, a subjective benefit can be achieved when wearing the CROS processor.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Medicine,Otorhinolaryngology
Reference24 articles.
1. Smulders YE, van Zon A, Stegeman I, Rinia AB, Van Zanten GA, Stokroos RJ, Hendrice N, Free RH, Maat B, Frijns JHM, Briaire JJ, Mylanus EAM, Huinck WJ, Smit AL, Topsakal V, Tange RA, Grolman W (2016) Comparison of bilateral and unilateral cochlear implantation in adults: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 142(3):249–256
2. van Hoesel RJM, Tyler RS (2003) Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 113(3):1617–1630
3. Wimmer W, Kompis M, Stieger C, Caversaccio M, Weder S (2017) Directional microphone contralateral routing of signals in cochlear implant users: a within-subjects comparison. Comparative Study 38(3):6
4. Guevara N, Grech C, Gahide I, Gallego S (2015) Assessment of the contralateral routing of signal system in unilateral cochlear implantation. Clin Otolaryngol 40(6):535–544
5. van Loon MC, Goverts ST, Merkus P, Hensen EF, Smits C (2014) The addition of a contralateral microphone for unilateral cochlear implant users: not an alternative for bilateral cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 35(9):e233–239
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献