Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the continued rehabilitation motivation in patients with postparalytic facial synkinesis (PFS).
Methods
In this single-center cross-sectional survey, the multidimensional patient questionnaire for assessment of rehabilitation motivation (PAREMO-20) was used to assess the rehabilitation motivation. Associations Sunnybrook and Stennert index grading, Facial Clinimetric Evaluation (FaCE) survey, general quality of life (SF-36), Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9, technology commitment and affinity, and interest in further therapy were analyzed.
Results
69 adults with PFS (73% women; median age: 54 years) answered the survey. In comparison to prior treatment forms, there was a significant higher future interest in computer-based home facial training (p < 0.0001). For PAREMO Psychological burden subscore, SF36 Emotional role was the highest negative correlative factor (p < 0.0001). For PAREMO Physical burden subscore, SF-36 General health was the highest negative correlative factor (p = 0.018). Working (p = 0.033) and permanent relationship (p = 0.029) were the only independent factors correlated to PAREMO Social Support Subscore. Higher positive impacts of technology affinity was inversely correlated to PAREMO Knowledge subscore (p = 0.017). Lower SF-36 Role physical subscore p = 0.045) and a lower SF-36 General health (p = 0.013) were correlated to a higher PAREMO Skepticism subscore.
Conclusions
Patients with PFS seem to have a high facial motor and non-motor psychosocial impairment even after several facial therapies. Rehabilitation-related motivation increases with both, higher facial motor and non-motor dysfunction. Social and emotional dysfunction are drivers to be interested in innovative digital therapy forms.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie
Universitätsklinikum Jena
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Medicine,Otorhinolaryngology
Reference35 articles.
1. Raslan A, Guntinas-Lichius O, Volk GF (2019) Altered facial muscle innervation pattern in patients with postparetic facial synkinesis. Laryngoscope 130(5):E320–E326
2. Volk GF, Thielker J, Moller MC et al (2020) Tolerability of facial electrostimulation in healthy adults and patients with facial synkinesis. Eur Archiv Otorhinolaryngol 277:1247–1253
3. Bradbury ET, Simons W, Sanders R (2006) Psychological and social factors in reconstructive surgery for hemi-facial palsy. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 59:272–278
4. van Veen MM, Quatela O, Tavares-Brito J et al (2019) Patient-perceived severity of synkinesis reduces quality of life in facial palsy: a cross-sectional analysis in 92 patients. Clin Otolaryngol 44:483–486
5. Butler DP, Morales DR, Johnson K, Nduka C (2019) Facial palsy: when and why to refer for specialist care. Br J Gen Pract 69:579–580
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献