How reliable is anamnestic data in predicting the clinical relevance of house dust mite sensitization?

Author:

Englhard Anna S.ORCID,Holzer Martin,Eder Katharina,Gellrich Donata,Gröger Moritz

Abstract

Abstract Purpose For perennial inhalant allergens such as house dust mite (HDM), the German guideline on allergen-specific immunotherapy explicitly recommends provocation testing. This procedure is time-consuming, expensive, and potentially dangerous for the patient. Recently it has been discussed whether provocation tests are really necessary for diagnosing allergy to Dermatophagoides species. Thus, our study aimed to analyze the concordance between nasal provocation tests with Dermatophagoides species and anamnestic data. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the concordance between patients’ histories including self-reported symptom scores and the results of provocation testing in 471 individuals with proven sensitization to Dermatophagoides species. Results 248 patients had a positive nasal provocation test (NPT) result to Dermatophagoides species and 223 individuals a negative NPT result. Patients allergic to HSM suffered significantly more often from atopic dermatitis (14% vs. 7%, p = 0.046) and more from asthma (20% vs. 19%, p = 0.851). Moreover, individuals with clinically silent sensitization complained less about nasal secretion (37% vs. 45%, p = 0.244) but significantly more about nasal dryness (46% vs. 34%, p = 0.046) whereas rates of nasal airway obstruction, ocular complaints and sleep quality were comparable in both groups. Allergic patients reported more often perennial (34% vs. 30%, p = 0.374) and location-dependent (39% vs. 31%, p = 0.090) symptoms. However, the discrepant prevalence of atopic dermatitis was the only statistically significant difference between both groups. Conclusion Despite slight differences between both patient groups, clinical data are not sufficient to distinguish between silent sensitization and clinically relevant allergic rhinitis to HDM. Therefore, nasal provocation testing remains the gold standard for assessing clinical relevance in patients sensitized to Dermatophagoides species.

Funder

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Medicine,Otorhinolaryngology

Reference53 articles.

1. Bousquet PJ, Chinn S, Janson C, Kogevinas M, Burney P, Jarvis D, European Community Respiratory Health Survey I (2007) Geographical variation in the prevalence of positive skin tests to environmental aeroallergens in the European Community Respiratory Health Survey I. Allergy 62(3):301–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2006.01293.x

2. Calderon MA, Linneberg A, Kleine-Tebbe J, De Blay F, Fernandez H, de Rojas D, Virchow JC, Demoly P (2015) Respiratory allergy caused by house dust mites: what do we really know? J Allergy Clin Immunol 136(1):38–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2014.10.012

3. Newson RB, van Ree R, Forsberg B, Janson C, Lotvall J, Dahlen SE, Toskala EM, Baelum J, Brozek GM, Kasper L, Kowalski ML, Howarth PH, Fokkens WJ, Bachert C, Keil T, Kramer U, Bislimovska J, Gjomarkaj M, Loureiro C, Burney PG, Jarvis D (2014) Geographical variation in the prevalence of sensitization to common aeroallergens in adults: the GA(2) LEN survey. Allergy 69(5):643–651. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.12397

4. Burbach GJ, Heinzerling LM, Edenharter G, Bachert C, Bindslev-Jensen C, Bonini S, Bousquet J, Bousquet-Rouanet L, Bousquet PJ, Bresciani M, Bruno A, Canonica GW, Darsow U, Demoly P, Durham S, Fokkens WJ, Giavi S, Gjomarkaj M, Gramiccioni C, Haahtela T, Kowalski ML, Magyar P, Murakozi G, Orosz M, Papadopoulos NG, Rohnelt C, Stingl G, Todo-Bom A, von Mutius E, Wiesner A, Wohrl S, Zuberbier T (2009) GA(2)LEN skin test study II: clinical relevance of inhalant allergen sensitizations in Europe. Allergy 64(10):1507–1515. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02089.x

5. Blomme K, Tomassen P, Lapeere H, Huvenne W, Bonny M, Acke F, Bachert C, Gevaert P (2013) Prevalence of allergic sensitization versus allergic rhinitis symptoms in an unselected population. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 160(2):200–207. https://doi.org/10.1159/000339853

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3