Evaluation of an impedance-based method to monitor the insertion of the electrode array during cochlear implantation
-
Published:2024-04-02
Issue:8
Volume:281
Page:4121-4131
-
ISSN:0937-4477
-
Container-title:European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
Author:
Gottfried Timo M., Galeazzi Pablo, Föger Aline, Dejaco Daniel, Tröger Andrea, Fischer Natalie, Innerhofer Veronika, Di Trapani Francesco, Weiss Nora, Seebacher Josef, Dierker Angelika, Schmutzhard JoachimORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Cochlear implantation is a prevalent remedy for severe-to-profound hearing loss. Optimising outcomes and hearing preservation, and minimising insertion trauma, require precise electrode placement. Objective monitoring during the insertion process can provide valuable insights and enhance surgical precision. This study assesses the feasibility and performance of an impedance-based method for monitoring electrode insertion, compared to the surgeon’s feedback.
Methods
The study utilised the Insertion Monitoring Tool (IMT) research software, allowing for real-time measurement of impedance and evoked compound action potential (eCAP) during electrode insertion in 20 patient implantations. This enabled an impedance-based method to continuously assess the status of each electrode during the insertion process. The feasibility and performance was evaluated and compared to the surgeon’s feedback approach. eCAP measurements focused merely on feasibility without searching specific responses.
Results
The IMT demonstrated feasibility in measuring real-time impedances and eCAP during the insertion of the electrode array. The impedance-based method exhibited potential for accurately monitoring the insertion depth with a high success rate. However, further development is needed to improve the number of usable contacts.
Conclusions
Objective monitoring with the impedance-based method shows promise as a valuable tool to enhance the precision of cochlear implant electrode insertion respecting insertion distance estimation. The IMT research software proved feasible in recording real-time impedances and eCAP during electrode insertion. While this impedance-based method exhibits high success rates, further improvements are required to optimise the number of usable contacts. This study highlights the potential of objective monitoring techniques to enhance cochlear implantation outcomes.
Funder
University of Innsbruck and Medical University of Innsbruck
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference20 articles.
1. Cortés Fuentes IA, Videhult Pierre P, Engmér Berglin C (2020) Improving clinical outcomes in cochlear implantation using glucocorticoid therapy: A review. Ear Hear 41:17–24 2. Rajan G, Tavora-Vieira D, Baumgartner WD, Godey B, Müller J, O’Driscoll M, Skarzynski H, Skarzynski P, Usami SI, Adunka O, Agrawal S, Bruce I, De Bodt M, Caversaccio M, Pilsbury H, Gavilán J, Hagen R, Hagr A, Kameswaran M, Karltorp E, Kompis M, Kuzovkov V, Lassaletta L, Yongxin L, Lorens A, Manoj M, Martin J, Mertens G, Mlynski R, Parnes L, Pulibalathingal S, Radeloff A, Raine CH, Rajeswaran R, Schmutzhard J, Sprinzl G, Staecker H, Stephan K, Sugarova S, Zernotti M, Zorowka P, Van de Heyning P (2018) Hearing preservation cochlear implantation in children: The hearring group consensus and practice guide. Cochlear Implants Int 19:1–13 3. Toner FM, Sanli H, Hall AC, Birman CS (2020) Intraoperative cochlear implant reinsertion effects evaluated by electrode impedance. Otol Neurotol 41:e695–e699 4. Topsakal V, Agrawal S, Atlas M, Baumgartner WD, Brown K, Bruce IA, Dazert S, Hagen R, Lassaletta L, Mlynski R, Raine CH, Rajan GP, Schmutzhard J, Sprinzl GM, Staecker H, Usami SI, Van Rompaey V, Zernotti M (2022) Heyning PV (2022) Minimally traumatic cochlear implant surgery: Expert opinion in 2010 and 2020. J Pers Med 12(10):1551 5. Adunka O, Gstoettner W, Hambek M, Unkelbach MH, Radeloff A, Kiefer J (2004) Preservation of basal inner ear structures in cochlear implantation. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 66:306–312
|
|