Authors’ response to the letter to the editor: “Conventional versus diode laser stapedotomy: audiological outcomes and clinical safety”-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Authors’ response to the letter to the editor: “Conventional versus diode laser stapedotomy: audiological outcomes and clinical safety”

Published:2024-09-06 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:0937-4477
Container-title:European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
language:en
Short-container-title:Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol

Author:

Ordóñez Ordóñez Leonardo Elías^ORCID,Perdomo Daniela Cerón,Saboya Claudia Paola González,Mejía Felipe Osorio,Medina-Parra Jorge,Martínez Esther Sofía Angulo

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00405-024-08946-w.pdf

Reference7 articles.

1. Ordóñez Ordóñez LE, Cerón Perdomo D, González Saboya CP et al (2024) Conventional versus diode laser stapedotomy: audiological outcomes and clinical safety. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 281:3443–3452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08429-4

2. Zhang JP, Huang GJ (2024) Conventional versus diode laser stapedotomy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08833-4

3. Chen PH, Lin KN, Lin HY, Yu RB, Liu PY, Shih WT et al (2024) Factors Associated With Hearing Outcomes After Stapedotomy in Taiwanese Patients With Clinical Otosclerosis. Ear Nose Throat J. 103:NP76–NP84. https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613211037645.aaa

4. Husain Q, Lin KF, Selesnick SH (2028) Stapes prosthesis length and hearing outcomes. Laryngoscope 128:722–726. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26700

5. Altamami NM, Huyghues des Etages G, Fieux M, Coudert A, Hermann R, Zaouche S, et al (2019) Is one of these two techniques: CO2 laser versus microdrill assisted stapedotomy results in better post-operative hearing outcome? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 276:1907–1913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05415-7