Abstract
AbstractWorkers, especially those involved in jobs requiring extended standing or repetitive movements, often face significant health challenges due to Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs). To mitigate MSD risks, enhancing workplace ergonomics is vital, which includes forecasting long-term employee postures, educating workers about related occupational health risks, and offering relevant recommendations. However, research gaps remain, such as the lack of a sustainable AI/ML pipeline that combines sensor-based, uncertainty-aware posture prediction with large language models for natural language communication of occupational health risks and recommendations. We introduce ERG-AI, a machine learning pipeline designed to predict extended worker postures using data from multiple wearable sensors. Alongside providing posture prediction and uncertainty estimates, ERG-AI also provides personalized health risk assessments and recommendations by generating prompts based on its performance and prompting Large Language Model (LLM) APIs, like GPT-4, to obtain user-friendly output. We used the Digital Worker Goldicare dataset to assess ERG-AI, which includes data from 114 home care workers who wore five tri-axial accelerometers in various bodily positions for a cumulative 2913 hours. The evaluation focused on the quality of posture prediction under uncertainty, energy consumption and carbon footprint of ERG-AI and the effectiveness of personalized recommendations rendered in easy-to-understand language.
Funder
HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Norges Forskningsråd
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference83 articles.
1. Holtermann A, Schnohr P, Nordestgaard BG, Marott JL (2021) The physical activity paradox in cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: the contemporary copenhagen general population study with 104 046 adults. Eur Heart J 42(15):1499–1511
2. Cillekens B, Lang M, Van Mechelen W, Verhagen E, Huysmans MA, Holtermann A, Van Der Beek AJ, Coenen P (2020) How does occupational physical activity influence health? an umbrella review of 23 health outcomes across 158 observational studies. Br J Sports Med 54(24):1474–1481
3. Lim S, D’Souza C (2020) A narrative review on contemporary and emerging uses of inertial sensing in occupational ergonomics. Int J Ind Ergon 76:102937
4. Krugh M, Waldherr F, Gujarathi S, Kerner S, Mears L (2022) Wearable motion and force sensing to determine force exertion and task recognition for ergonomic analysis. In: IIE Annual Conference. Proc. pp 1–5. Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE)
5. Sharma M, Suri N, Kant S (2022) Analyzing occupational heat stress using sensor-based monitoring: a wearable approach with environmental ergonomics perspective. Int J Environ Sci Technol 19(11):11421–11434