Abstract
AbstractWith the swift growth of the information over the past few years, taking full benefit is increasingly essential. Question Answering System is one of the promising methods to access this much information. The Question Answering System lacks humans’ common sense and reasoning power and cannot identify unanswerable questions and irrelevant questions. These questions are answered by making unreliable and incorrect guesses. In this paper, we address this limitation by proposing a Question Similarity mechanism. Before a question is posed to a Question-Answering system, it is compared with possible generated questions of the given paragraph, and then a Question Similarity Score is generated. The Question Similarity mechanism effectively identifies the unanswerable and irrelevant questions. The proposed Question Similarity mechanism incorporates a human way of reasoning to identify unanswerable and irrelevant questions. This mechanism can avoid the unanswerable and irrelevant questions altogether from being posed to the Question Answering system. It helps the Question Answering Systems to focus only on the answerable questions to improve their performance. Along with this, we introduce an application of the Question Answering System that generates the question-answer pairs given a passage and is useful in several fields.
Funder
Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference46 articles.
1. Baudiš P, Šedivý J (2015) Modeling of the Question Answering Task in the yodaQA System. In: Mothe J, Savoy J, Kamps J, Pinel-Sauvagnat K, Jones G, San Juan E, Capellato L, Ferro N (eds) Experimental IR meets multilinguality, multimodality, and interaction. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 222–228
2. Benamara F (2004) Cooperative question answering in restricted domains: the WEBCOOP experiment. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Question Answering in Restricted Domains, pp. 31–38. Association for Computational Linguistics, Barcelona. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W04-0506
3. Berant J, Chou A, Frostig R, Liang P (2013) Semantic Parsing on Freebase from Question-Answer Pairs. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 1533–1544. Association for Computational Linguistics, Seattle. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D13-1160
4. Bollacker K, Evans C, Paritosh P, Sturge T, Taylor J (2008) Freebase: A collaboratively created graph database for structuring human knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, SIGMOD ’08. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, pp 1247–1250. https://doi.org/10.1145/1376616.1376746
5. Catelli R, Casola V, De Pietro G, Fujita H, Esposito M (2021) Combining contextualized word representation and sub-document level analysis through Bi-LSTM+CRF architecture for clinical de-identification. Knowl-Based Syst 213:106649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106649, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950705120307784
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. IMAI: A short text matching model integrating multi-angle information;Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems;2024-03-29
2. AgriResponse: A Real-Time Agricultural Query-Response Generation System for Assisting Nationwide Farmers;IEEE Access;2024
3. Leveraging LLMs and MLPs in Designing a Computer Science Placement Test System;2023 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI);2023-12-13
4. Bug characterization in machine learning-based systems;Empirical Software Engineering;2023-12-05
5. ViQG: Web Tool for Automatic Question Generation from Code for Viva Preparation;2023 26th Conference of the Oriental COCOSDA International Committee for the Co-ordination and Standardisation of Speech Databases and Assessment Techniques (O-COCOSDA);2023-12-04