Abstract
Abstract In the Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (central Spain), the population of Iberian wild goat, also known as Spanish ibex (Capra pyrenaica) has grown strongly since its reintroduction three decades ago. The plant community is now under heavy browsing pressure due to this high population. A study of the presence of moss on rocks was used herein as the basis for the design of an indicator, named impact on mosses (im), to describe the environmental pressure exerted by the Iberian wild goat in terms of moss removal. Granite and gneiss zones at medium altitudes with continental Mediterranean climate are the most suitable areas for successful application of the indicator. The hypotheses to test are: (1) the indicator will discriminate between areas with different wild goat pressure levels, (2) wild goat pressure will explain a high proportion of moss loss variance, and (3) the im indicator will be useful to establish a mathematical model between wild goat pressure and moss loss. The proposed indicator was analyzed using both statistical and data science techniques. The results support the mentioned hypotheses. Specifically, statistically significant differences were found regarding the impact on mosses between areas with different levels of Iberian wild goat pressure. Thus, a high proportion of the variance was associated with wild goat pressure (80% for high-pressure areas, 56% for low-pressure areas). A modified parabolic function was fit to express the relationship between Iberian wild goat pressure and impact on mosses. In conclusion, the im indicator was shown to be a useful tool to assess pressure due to Iberian wild goat. Therefore, im can help assess and manage Iberian wild goat populations and determine their sustainable levels.
Funder
Comunidad de Madrid
Universidad Nacional de Educacion Distancia
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference53 articles.
1. Anscombe FJ (1973) Graphs in statistical analysis. Am Stat 27:17–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/2682899
2. Armstrong DP, Seddon PJ (2008) Directions in reintroduction biology. Trends Ecol Evol 23:20–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.003
3. Aroztegui Vélez J, Iglesias Soilán M, Fernández J (2020) SimGuide. Una arquitectura de programas de intervención educativa para el desarrollo del pensamiento formal. In: Gázquez Linares JJ, Molero Jurado MM, Martos Martínez A, Barragán Martín AB, Simón Márquez MM, Sisto M, Salvador RMP and Tortosa Martínez BM (eds) Investigación en el ámbito escolar. Nuevas realidades en un acercamiento multidimensional a las variables psicológicas y educativas. Tomo IV, pp 1303–1318. Dykinson, Madrid
4. Blanca MJ, Alarcón R, Arnau J, Bono R, Bendayan R (2017) Non-normal data: Is ANOVA still a valid option? Psicothema 29:552–557. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.383
5. Blanco Castro JE, Acón Remacha M (1984) Hepáticas de La Pedriza. Anal Biol Facult Biol Univ Murcia 2:209–214
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献