The effective application of international human rights law standards to the sporting domain: Should UN monitoring bodies take central stage?

Author:

González Carmen PérezORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis work aims to reflect on the role that UN human rights monitoring bodies—both charter and treaty based—could play in tackling human rights violations of athletes rights occurred in the sporting domain. While recognizing the autonomy of sports associations in the application of their own lex sportiva, the author maintains that the perspective and concrete recommendations provided by UN human rights mechanisms could help (i) raise human rights standards applied by sporting associations and (ii) more effectively combat discriminatory and other harmful or unfair practices in sport. Thus, the purpose of the analysis is twofold. First, the work will examine the reasons behind the absence of a significant UN human rights mechanisms/bodies practice so far. Secondly, it will support that autonomy of sport should not imply that athletes could be prevented from having access to these mechanisms seeking concrete recommendations regarding changes in situations of discrimination or application of such harmful or unfair practices. While identifying certain obstacles to individual access, the work advocates for a more decisive action of these mechanisms in this regard. In particular, through Committees’ General Recommendations and Concluding Observations, on the one hand, and special procedures of the Human Rights Council’s pronouncements, on the other.

Funder

Universidad Carlos III

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law

Reference39 articles.

1. Alston P, Mégret F (2013) Introduction: appraising the United Nations human rights regime. In: Alston P, Mégret F (eds) The United Nations and human rights: a critical appraisal. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–36

2. Anderson J, Partington N (2018) Duty of care in sport: time for a sports ombudsman? Int Sports Law Rev 1:3–10

3. Bonnitcha J, McCorquodale R (2017) The concept of ‘Due Diligence’ in the UN guiding principles on business and human rights. EJIL 28(3):899–919. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chx042

4. Boon KE (2014) Are control tests fit for the future? The slippage problem in attribution doctrines. Melb J Int Law 15(2):330–377

5. Boxill J (2006) Football and Feminism. J Philos Sport 33(2):115–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2006.9714696

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3