Abstract
AbstractThe three rulings of 21 December 2023 make three changes to the way we understand the structure of EU sports law. I examine all three in this paper, but I do not think any of the changes are radical. Things have changed – but not much, and the fundamentals of EU sports law, nurtured by the Court in case law that commenced in 1974, are untouched by the Court’s latest three rulings. To be clear: my concern in this paper is only with the structure of EU sports law. For UEFA, and in particular for its power to act as a ‘gatekeeper’ through a system of prior approval for new competitions offered by third parties, things have changed a lot, but that is a separate issue.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference11 articles.
1. Brook O (2022) Non-competition interests in EU Antitrust Law: an empirical study of article 101 TFEU. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
2. Budzinski O (2023) (Sports) Economics Upside Down? A comment on the Advocate General opinion in European Superleague v. UEFA/ FIFA. Concurrences Competition Law Review No. 1-2023, The Future of Sport Governance in Europe, https://www.concurrences.com/fr/review/issues/no-1-2023/conferences/the-future-of-sport-governance-in-europe-bruxelles-13-janvier-2023
3. Cattaneo A, Parrish R (2020) Sports Law in the European Union. Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn
4. García B, Weatherill S (2012) Engaging with the EU in order to minimize its impact: sport and the negotiation of the Treaty of Lisbon. J Eur Public Policy 19(2):238–256
5. Heermann P (2022) Verbandsautonomie Im Sport. Baden-Baden, Nomos
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献