The seven sins of pseudo-science-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The seven sins of pseudo-science

Published:1993-03 Issue:1 Volume:24 Page:17-42
ISSN:0925-4560
Container-title:Journal for General Philosophy of Science
language:en
Short-container-title:J Gen Philos Sci

Author:

Derksen A. A.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,General Social Sciences,Philosophy

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF00769513.pdf

Reference37 articles.

1. Cioffi, F.: 1985, ‘Psychoanalysis, Pseudo-science and Testability’, in Curry, G. and Musgrave A. (eds.): 1985,Popper and the Human Sciences, Nijhoff, Dordrecht.

2. Cohen, R. S. and L. Laudan (eds.): 1983,Physics, Philosophy and Psychoanalysis, Reidel, Dordrecht.

3. Derksen, A. A.: 1985, ‘Falsifiability as Fake-Cement: The Alleged Unity of Karl Popper's Philosophy of Science’,Philosophical Studies 48, 313–336.

4. Derksen, A. A.: 1992, ‘Does the Tally Argument Make Freud a Sophisticated Methodologist?, Grünbaumn's Friendly Attempt to Save Freud as a Methodologist’,Philosophy of Science 59, 75–101.

5. Edelson, M.: 1984,Hypothesis and Evidence in Psychoanalysis, Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Cited by 26 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Fake Research: How Can We Recognise it and Respond to it?;International Studies in the Philosophy of Science;2023-03-21

2. Demarcation without Dogmas;Theoria;2022-02-13

3. Diagnosing Pseudoscience – by Getting Rid of the Demarcation Problem;Journal for General Philosophy of Science;2021-10-27

4. Feng Shui in Science Programmes;Science & Education;2021-10-06

5. A Virtue Epistemological Approach to the Demarcation Problem;Science & Education;2021-08-29