Author:
Meyer Hans-Jakob,Mödl Lukas,Unruh Olesya,Xiang Weiwei,Berger Sarah,Müller-Plathe Moritz,Rohde Gernot,Pletz Mathias W.,Rupp Jan,Suttorp Norbert,Witzenrath Martin,Zoller Thomas,Mittermaier Mirja,Steinbeis Fridolin, ,Fuchs A,Engelmann M,Stolz D,Bauer W,Mücke H. C,Schmager S,Schaaf B,Kremling J,Nickoleit-Bitzenberger D,Azzaui H,Hower M,Hempel F,Prebeg K,Popkirova K,Kolditz M,Bellinghausen C,Grünewaldt A,Panning M,Welte T,Fühner T,van’t Klooster M.,Barten-Neiner G,Kröner W,Adaskina N,Eberherdt F,Julius C,Illig T,Klopp N,Schleenvoigt B. T,Forstner C,Moeser A,Ankert J,Drömann D,Parschke P,Franzen K,Käding N,Waldeck F,Spinner C,Erber J,Voit F,Schneider J,Heigener D,Hering I,Albrich W,Seneghini M,Rassouli F,Baldesberger S,Essig A,Stenger S,Wallner M,Burgmann H,Traby L,Schubert L,Chen R
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and non-COVID-19 community-acquired pneumonia (NC-CAP) often result in hospitalization with considerable risks of mortality, ICU treatment, and long-term morbidity. A comparative analysis of clinical outcomes in COVID-19 CAP (C-CAP) and NC-CAP may improve clinical management.
Methods
Using prospectively collected CAPNETZ study data (January 2017 to June 2021, 35 study centers), we conducted a comprehensive analysis of clinical outcomes including in-hospital death, ICU treatment, length of hospital stay (LOHS), 180-day survival, and post-discharge re-hospitalization rate. Logistic regression models were used to examine group differences between C-CAP and NC-CAP patients and associations with patient demography, recruitment period, comorbidity, and treatment.
Results
Among 1368 patients (C-CAP: n = 344; NC-CAP: n = 1024), C-CAP showed elevated adjusted probabilities for in-hospital death (aOR 4.48 [95% CI 2.38–8.53]) and ICU treatment (aOR 8.08 [95% CI 5.31–12.52]) compared to NC-CAP. C-CAP patients were at increased risk of LOHS over seven days (aOR 1.88 [95% CI 1.47–2.42]). Although ICU patients had similar in-hospital mortality risk, C-CAP was associated with length of ICU stay over seven days (aOR 3.59 [95% CI 1.65–8.38]). Recruitment period influenced outcomes in C-CAP but not in NC-CAP. During follow-up, C-CAP was linked to a reduced risk of re-hospitalization and mortality post-discharge (aOR 0.43 [95% CI 0.27–0.70]).
Conclusion
Distinct clinical trajectories of C-CAP and NC-CAP underscore the need for adapted management to avoid acute and long-term morbidity and mortality amid the evolving landscape of CAP pathogens.
Funder
Vaxxilon GmbH, Biotest AG
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Deutsches Zentrum für Lungenforschung
Berlin Institute of Health
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC