Author:
Kaba Hani E. J.,Misailovski Martin,Brähler Jasmin,Garcia Josué A. Bucio,Artelt Tanja,Raupach Tobias,Scheithauer Simone
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Many curricula promote frontal teaching approaches, potentially decreasing interaction and motivation – also within infection prevention & control and infectious diseases (IPC/ID). We aimed to investigate the implementation of three innovative teaching methods (ITM) within IPC/ID education: game-based learning (GBL), peer-teaching (PT) and misinformation detection (MID).
Methods
Multi-phase study involving third-year medical students was conducted. Phase-1 included a cross-sectional survey, assessing previous ITM-experience and interest to participate in phase-2, where the students were divided into teams. Each team prepared a video covering an IPC/ID-topic with deliberately placed misinformation, which had to be identified and corrected by the opposing team, followed by qualitative evaluation (phase-3). Finally, the MID-concept was incorporated into regular curricula in a non-competitive environment (phase-4) and evaluated within a cohort not involved in phases 1–3.
Results
276 students responded to phase-1. 58% expressed interest in participating in phase-2. Roughly 59% [47–71%] CI-95% of respondents without previous PT-experience stated interest in PT, while the interest in GBL and MID was even higher. 19 students participated in phase-2. All topic MID-scores ranged between 6 and 8/10 points, except for emporiatrics (3/10). Post-hoc analysis revealed a positive student-perception of ITM, particularly GBL. Phase-4 received 103 responses with general positive evaluation. Major agreements existed on the usefulness of critical information evaluation for medical practice (82% [75–91%] CI-95%) and of MID during studies (69% [59–79%] CI-95%).
Conclusion
our results hint at a relatively high interest in ITM and show MID applicability in regular IPC/ID curricula, which could be of advantage for the learning environment.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC