Author:
Post Anne-Eva,Bathoorn Erik,Postma Douwe F.,Slebos Dirk-Jan,Akkerman Onno W.
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Bronchoalveolar lavage is commonly used in clinical practice for unresolved pneumonia. However, bronchoalveolar lavage is not suitable for all patients as it is an invasive procedure and can worsen oxygenation. The diagnostic value of bronchial wash and sputum has been debated extensively over the years. In this study, we aim to compare the diagnostic value in several pathogens of bronchoalveolar lavage and bronchial wash, and secondarily bronchoalveolar lavage and sputum.
Methods
We retrospectively included all adult patients in our hospital who underwent bronchoalveolar lavage, bronchial wash, and where sputum sampling was done between January 1st of 2018 and December 31st of 2021. The intraclass correlation coefficient was computed for the three tests.
Results
In total, 308 patients were included. We found a level of correlation of 0.819 and 0.865, respectively, between bronchoalveolar lavage and bronchial wash for two pathogens: Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. For Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Aspergillus fumigatus, we found an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.568 and 0.624, respectively. Between bronchoalveolar lavage and sputum, we found varying levels of agreement.
Conclusion
Our study shows reasonably well agreement levels between bronchoalveolar lavage and bronchial wash, suggesting that bronchial wash could potentially be an alternative to bronchoalveolar lavage.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference21 articles.
1. World Health Organization. Fact sheet: Top 10 causes of death. WHO. 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death. Cited 2023 January 14. Accessed 15 Jan 2024
2. Murdoch DR, O’Brien KL, Scott JAG, Karron RA, Bhat N, Driscoll AJ, et al. Breathing new life into pneumonia diagnostics. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:3405–8.
3. Holter JC, Müller F, Bjørang O, Samdal HH, Marthinsen JB, Jenum PA, et al. Etiology of community-acquired pneumonia and diagnostic yields of microbiological methods: a 3-year prospective study in Norway. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:64–75.
4. Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, Bartlett JG, Campbell GD, Dean NC, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society Consensus Guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44:S27–72.
5. Ewig S, Schlochtermeier M, Goöke N, Niederman MS. Applying sputum as a diagnostic tool in pneumonia: Limited yield, minimal impact on treatment decisions. Chest. 2002;121:1486–92.